Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Mark Martinec
On Wednesday March 6 2013 01:06:22 Scott Ostrander wrote: > cd /usr/share/GeoIP > wget -N http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/GeoLiteCountry/GeoIP.dat.gz > gunzip GeoIP.dat.gz Not to forget to download its IPv6 counterpart: http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/Ge

RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Ostrander
> -Original Message- > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:13 PM > To: Scott Ostrander; Benny Pedersen; spamassassin > Subject: Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4 > > > > > > Is there a way to upgrade GeoIP ? > I think you have to grab files from http://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/geolite > > Ma

Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 3/5/13 2:15 PM, "Scott Ostrander" wrote: > >> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu] >> >> Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 20:22: >>> On system A (SA 3.4) I am getting RELAY_COUNTRY_XX Same email on >>> system B (SA 3.2.2) I get RELAY_COUNTRY_ES correctly resolved. >> >> ip2cc 2.1

Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Lutz Petersen skrev den 2013-03-05 21:44: Simple question: If there is a need for locate the ip - why not use the well maintained countries.nerd.dk ? one dns lookup pr sender recieved ip ? i like to keep this trafic local, and nerd.dk have rsync shareing last time i did it, but did not like

RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 21:40: On system A (SA 3.4) I removed Geo::IP and it now correctly resolves the Relay-Country as ES Looks like I will have to keep manually updating IP::Country::Fast ;( [I] dev-libs/geoip Available versions: 1.4.8-r1 1.4.8-r2 ~1.4.8-r3 {{city ipv6

Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Lutz Petersen
> > ip::country::fast is depricated alone since its not update with new ips, it > > still > > works if your still have ipv4 mailserver and self do updates with dbmscript > > On system A (SA 3.4) I removed Geo::IP and it now correctly resolves the > Relay-Country as ES > Looks like I will have t

RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Ostrander
> -Original Message- > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:37 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4 > > Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 21:15: > > plase fix your reply template, replyed sender email should not be in body > content > > >

RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 21:15: From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu] plase fix your reply template, replyed sender email should not be in body content However system A (3.4) also has GeoIP installed as suggested at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RelayCountryPlugin Is

RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Ostrander
> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu] > > Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 20:22: > > On system A (SA 3.4) I am getting RELAY_COUNTRY_XX Same email on > > system B (SA 3.2.2) I get RELAY_COUNTRY_ES correctly resolved. > > ip2cc 2.104.223.10 > > if not found you need updates > > X

Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 20:22: On system A (SA 3.4) I am getting RELAY_COUNTRY_XX Same email on system B (SA 3.2.2) I get RELAY_COUNTRY_ES correctly resolved. ip2cc 2.104.223.10 if not found you need updates XX is imho ip is not in use

X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Ostrander
On system A (SA 3.4) I am getting RELAY_COUNTRY_XX Same email on system B (SA 3.2.2) I get RELAY_COUNTRY_ES correctly resolved. System A is Centos6 SA 3.4.0-r1435395 perl-Geo-IP-1.38-6 perl-IP-Country-2.27-1 With updated cc.gif and ip.gif from http://mailfud.org/ip-country-fast/ System A is wo

Re: NJABL is history

2013-03-05 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 3/4/2013 5:08 PM, Axb wrote: On 03/04/2013 08:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 3/4/2013 1:38 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail

Re: NJABL is history

2013-03-05 Thread jdow
On 2013/03/05 05:09, Axb wrote: On 03/05/2013 02:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevi

Re: NJABL is history

2013-03-05 Thread Axb
On 03/05/2013 02:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: And score __

Re: NJABL is history

2013-03-05 Thread Axb
On 03/05/2013 02:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: And score __

Re: NJABL is history

2013-03-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: And score __RCVD_IN_NJABL 0 just in case... On 04.03.13 10:38, Jo

Upgrade from SA 3.3.1 to 3.3.2 - increase in memory requirements on Debian 6

2013-03-05 Thread Simon Loewenthal
Hi all, I just upgraded a small server from 3.3.1 to 3.3.2 (Debain Squeeze). I notice that spamd now takes 64% of the memory which is 317 mb. This is rather high in my opinion. I realize this may well be a Debian specific question, but does _spamassassin 3.3.2-2~bpo60+1_ have any performa