-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2013 05:13 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm thinking about setting up to do nightly mass checks and looking for
> advice. Thanks in advance.
>
> I'm thinking about creating a virtual server that will receive a
forked copy of email that I pass th
* Robert Schetterer :
> Am 13.02.2013 05:13, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> > I'm thinking about setting up to do nightly mass checks and looking for
> > advice. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > I'm thinking about creating a virtual server that will receive a forked
> > copy of email that I pass that is deliver
Am 13.02.2013 05:13, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> I'm thinking about setting up to do nightly mass checks and looking for
> advice. Thanks in advance.
>
> I'm thinking about creating a virtual server that will receive a forked
> copy of email that I pass that is delivered eith to ham@ or spam@
> account
I'm thinking about setting up to do nightly mass checks and looking for
advice. Thanks in advance.
I'm thinking about creating a virtual server that will receive a forked
copy of email that I pass that is delivered eith to ham@ or spam@
accounts. Does this sound reasonable? I have been using m
From: Mike Grau
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:18:33 -0600
> Hmm I would do something like this (untested):
>
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?!US)[A-Z]{2}\b/
I've had to use, IIRC.
X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?!US|XX)([A-Z]{2})\b/
XX means unknown, mostl
On 2/12/13 1:15 PM, "David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:14:46 -0500
> "David F. Skoll" wrote:
>
>> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~
>> /\b(?:[A-TW-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
>
> Emm... should be
>
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT
On 12/02/13 18:47, Daniel McDonald wrote:
I’ve had a simple rule I use to see if mail is forwarded through a
“foreign country”:
header RELAY_NOT_USX-Relay-Countries =~
/\b(?:[ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTVWXYZ]{2}|\b/
describeRELAY_NOT_USRelayed though any country other than the U
>
> Hmm I would do something like this (untested):
>
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?!US)[A-Z]{2}\b/
>
I've had to use, IIRC.
X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?!US|XX)([A-Z]{2})\b/
On 2/12/2013 3:00 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:57:28 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries=~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
No. We leave it as an exercise to the reader to find out why that
solution is wrong.
Hmm I would do something like t
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:57:28 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries=~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
No. We leave it as an exercise to the reader to find out why that
solution is wrong.
Regards,
David.
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 14:15 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
>
Shouldn't that be:
header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries=~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
> of course. Sorry!
>
BTW, its no wonder so much spam cones from th
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:14:46 -0500
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?:[A-TW-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
Emm... should be
header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?:[A-TV-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
of course. Sorry!
Regards,
David.
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:58:40 -0600
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b[ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTVWXYZ]{2}\b/
How about:
header RELAY_NOT_US X-Relay-Countries =~ /\b(?:[A-TW-Z][A-Z]|[A-Z][A-RT-Z])\b/
Untested; use at your own risk. :)
Regards,
David.
PS: Beware of
On 2/12/13 12:47 PM, "Daniel McDonald"
wrote:
> I¹ve had a simple rule I use to see if mail is forwarded through a ³foreign
> country²:
>
> header RELAY_NOT_USX-Relay-Countries =~
> /\b(?:[ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTVWXYZ]{2}|\b/
Oops. I was fiddling with the syntax trying to fix it.
I¹ve had a simple rule I use to see if mail is forwarded through a ³foreign
country²:
header RELAY_NOT_USX-Relay-Countries =~
/\b(?:[ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTVWXYZ]{2}|\b/
describeRELAY_NOT_USRelayed though any country other than the US
score RELAY_NOT_US0.01
I mo
Anirudha,
> I have a stable running setup of postfix after-queue using amavis-new
> [currently using for content inspection and antivirus only] and would like
> to use this for additional spam protection.
>
> As i understand from the above comments to my query, i dont need to run the
> 'spamd' as
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Anirudha,
>
> > So what should be the ideal setup of running binaries. I want Amavis
> > running both Spamprotection and ANtivirus protection, hence i have below
> > process running in current production
> > 1. Postfix MTA
> > 2. Amavisd
> >
Anirudha,
> So what should be the ideal setup of running binaries. I want Amavis
> running both Spamprotection and ANtivirus protection, hence i have below
> process running in current production
> 1. Postfix MTA
> 2. Amavisd
> 3. Clamd
> Should the spamd be running for spamprotection via amavis-n
18 matches
Mail list logo
