Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Per Jessen skrev den 2013-02-05 08:27:
>
>> rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
>
> thats why i choiced to use reject_unverified_sender in postfix, and
> yes i know it can be abused, but it solves more problems then it
> creates for me
For me that creates too much traffic, u
Thanks for the reminder . . .
joe a.
>>> On 2/5/2013 at 1:03 PM, wrote:
> I feel like this comes up often enough, people not having trusted_networks
> or internal_networks set.
>
> Probably for most people it's unnecessary. But if you have some server
> relaying / forwarding mail to your se
Axb skrev den 2013-02-05 16:30:
On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes
not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules)
+1
worst case is whit
Marc Perkel skrev den 2013-02-05 16:20:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes
not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
tflags foo-rule noautolearn
Matthias Leisi skrev den 2013-02-05 10:43:
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
will it not be added to spamassassin rules ?
is the old rules still in rules out there ?
i have not followed progress on that, have being away from maillist for
long time now
Per Jessen skrev den 2013-02-05 08:27:
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
thats why i choiced to use reject_unverified_sender in postfix, and yes
i know it can be abused, but it solves more problems then it creates for
me
was the plan not to get it up again ?
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:42:45 -0800
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Yes - here's a sample. Hope it gets through.
Scored very high on Bayes for me. Here are the probabilities of words
and word-pairs reported by our Bayes engine:
Word: Although+escaped (0.990)
Word: Later+career (0.990)
Word: March+1603 (0.
I feel like this comes up often enough, people not having trusted_networks
or internal_networks set.
Probably for most people it's unnecessary. But if you have some server
relaying / forwarding mail to your server, and you don't have one of these
set, spamassassin is using the IP address of tha
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:08:47 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> It is implemented in the HTML parsing plugin so that's not a great
> concern.
Does that plugin understand CSS? Things like:
body.someclass p.something span { display: none; }
I'd surely be impressed if that's the case. :)
HTM
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 2/5/2013 8:08 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
> hide text? Seems like there should be.
>
>
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On Tue, 5 Feb 201
On 2/5/2013 8:08 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
etc. To do it properly, you
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to hide
text? Seems like there should be.
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
etc. To do it properly, you have to re-implement an entire HTML
rend
On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules)
On 2/5/2013 10:23 AM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit :
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn
That just tells SA to ignore this rule when d
Hi Mark,
maybe this works. This I stole it from someone who posted
here.
# HTML - White text on a white background. What is the
point?
rawbody HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT /style=.color#FFF;/
describe
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT White html txt on white bg
score
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT 0.1
Simon
---
"I
Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit :
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn
John.
--
-- Over 5000 webcams from ski resorts around the world - www.snoweye.com
-- Tr
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:17:46 -0800
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
> hide text? Seems like there should be.
>
Going down that path leads to madness. Then you have to worry about:
and variants
...where "white" is defined in CSS
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On 2/5/2013 6:22 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>> http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
>> >
>> > -- Matthias
> Thanks, I didn't know someone had decided to continue the project. I
> suggested it on the rfc-ignorant mailing list but there wasn't much
> interest.
Interesting and good news!... but their home page
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>
>
>> > This is what e.g. rfci-ignorant or many other rhsbl blacklists are
>> > for.
>>
>> rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
>>
>
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
>
> -- Matthias
Thanks, I didn't know someone had decided
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> > This is what e.g. rfci-ignorant or many other rhsbl blacklists are
> > for.
>
> rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
>
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
-- Matthias
22 matches
Mail list logo
