Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new

2013-02-01 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, RW wrote: ALLOWING APPENDS By appends we mean the case of mail moving when the source folder is unknown, e.g. when you move from some other account or with tools like offlineimap. You should be careful with allowing APPENDs to SPAM folders. The reason for possibly

Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new

2013-02-01 Thread RW
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:00:48 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Ben Johnson wrote: > > > John, thanks for pointing-out the problems associated with > > re-sending the messages via sendmail. > > > > I threw a line out to the Dovecot users group and learned how to > > move messages

Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin

2013-02-01 Thread Benny Pedersen
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-01-26 08:26: there is less you can do, if your mail provider does not give you chance to change antispam settings yourself i.e. in some gui and/or he is not willing to change it for you i begin to wonder how gmail handle it :=)

Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin

2013-02-01 Thread Benny Pedersen
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-01-26 08:22: as wrote, there is always a chance to whitelist something, but big mailplayers dont do it or cant do by tec reasons i.e if your sednded mail is comming from dynips it makes less sense to whitelist them, some stuff is more easy fixed at the sender i.

Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new

2013-02-01 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Ben Johnson wrote: John, thanks for pointing-out the problems associated with re-sending the messages via sendmail. I threw a line out to the Dovecot users group and learned how to move messages without going through the MTA. Dovecot has a utility executable, "deliver", whic

Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new

2013-02-01 Thread Ben Johnson
On 1/31/2013 5:50 PM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:12:15 -0800 (PST) > John Hardin wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote: >> > >>> So, I finally got around to tackling this change. >>> >>> With a couple of simple modifications, I was able to achieve the >>> desired result wit