Re: URIBL_BLACK unreilable?

2012-11-09 Thread Jonathan Nichols
> > So, why is it triggering URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_DBL_SPAM etc now, but > not when I received the original spam? > > Or was the database updated with those > URLs after I received that particular spam? > i It is quite likely that it was not in the database when you received it, but was added

URIBL_BLACK unreilable?

2012-11-09 Thread Igor Chudov
I receive a lot of spams similar to this one: http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam014.txt It is a spam, however it has a low score and hit my mailbox. When I reran spamassassin -D on this message, it was flagged as spam and I get the following: http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam014.trace.txt The diff

Re: Sample of a nasty one IMHO

2012-11-09 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 18:48 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > http://pastebin.com/H8NrruE1 > > An outfit that apparently not only does not honor unsubscribe > requests, but may simply count hits. > ...and harvest the e-mail addresses of those unwary enough to try unsubscribing. The latter is quite

Sample of a nasty one IMHO

2012-11-09 Thread Joseph Acquisto
http://pastebin.com/H8NrruE1 An outfit that apparently not only does not honor unsubscribe requests, but may simply count hits. I could be wrong. joe a.

Re: different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Jason Haar
Qmail-Scanner doesn't call SA as "spamc < file" - look to see how it is called and then run that by hand - you need to compare apples with apples hint: spamc -f -u email@address -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +1 408 481 8171 PGP Fingerprint: 7

Re: different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 11/9/2012 7:45 AM, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: I have a strange problem in Spamassassin - I have received spam which normally should have been blocked, but were not. I have received messages with a low score or even negative score, but when I save the e-mail to a file and run the spamc in th

Re: different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 10:45 -0200, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > > I have a strange problem in Spamassassin - I have received spam which > normally should have been blocked, but were not. > I have received messages with a low score or even negative score, but > when I save the e-mail to a f

Re: different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Niamh Holding
Hello Rejaine, Friday, November 9, 2012, 12:45:59 PM, you wrote: RM> Today for example, I received a message with a negative score RM> (message header say: SA: 0 (-93.5/5.0) whitelist_from in user_prefs perhaps? -- Best regards, Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk p

Re: different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 09/11/2012 14:45, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: Why this happing? I'm using spamassassin in conjunction with qmail-scanner-queue.pl : Internet --> Spam-Filter (qmail -> qmail-filters (rblsmtp, grey-list, etc) -> qmail-scanner-queue.pl (per-scanner+clamav+spamasssin) Someone also uses qmail-sc

different score from spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2012-11-09 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
I have a strange problem in Spamassassin - I have received spam which normally should have been blocked, but were not. I have received messages with a low score or even negative score, but when I save the e-mail to a file and run the spamc in the same message (using the same spamassassin se