On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/08/2012 10:44 AM, John Hardin wrote:
I will take a look at "claims manager" in the 419 rules.
I appreciate it, thanks.
Okay, I've committed some tuning for that rule. I will probably take a
couple of days before it shows up in a rules updat
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 07:23 -0800, R - elists wrote:
> is anyone else getting spam from venamail.com servers ?
>
No.
Martin
On 11/08/2012 10:44 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> This is a client of ours (a law firm) and not the company that I work
>> for. *I* know there's probably nothing sensitive in there, but just to
>> cover my ass I'd need to get permission to send the results off-site.
>
> Only the list of rules which
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/07/2012 10:36 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 11/07, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
This is my fault, of course, but I'm not allowed to mass-check this
stuff. It's ongoing legal correspondence.
Er, what? You're not allowed to provide a list of
is anyone else getting spam from venamail.com servers ?
they usually come from a something.co.uk type email addy
usually letting spam and now starting to adver other junk
we see a coupla few a week slip through.
how are you dealing with it in terms of spamassassin rules or otherwise?
- rh
Hello there,
Well if you feel uncomfortable with running mass-check and send data
(not the email themselves, just the rules they hit, as Darxus is
pointing out), you may want to override the score for those rules in
your local.cf.
You may even write you own rules to compensate those false positiv
