Here's an argument for *not* making your email address "fi...@example.com",
"l...@example.com" or something like that.
I believe an email to me starting "Dear Dfs," has 100% probability of
being spam. If my email address were "da...@roaringpenguin.com"
instead, I'd get a lot of FPs on "Dear Davi
On 10/26, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
> Well, discouraged was implicit (as is the fact that every admin is
I don't think there's anything implicit about it being discouraged to use a
threshold below 5. There are lots of local changes which are far less
likely to cause problems, and encouraged.
> The
On 10/26/2012 04:47 PM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
For example, I'm in the process of learning to use mass-check to
contribute back to SA (which implies a lot of hard work, simply to build
and maintain valid ham/spam corpora, use mass-check, then hit-freq, then
fp-fn-stat, I'm not even close to under
Alex, from prypiat.
Yes, I recycle.
On 12-10-25 03:04 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 10/25, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 10/25/2012 10:47 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>> * 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the rational behind this, or is our user
