Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: I just noticed this in /var/log/messages: Oct 22 20:20:11 mybox spamd[31966]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_db/bayes/" is not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_db/bay

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread Joseph Acquisto
> That's pretty easy. The SA man page says that the default bayes database > path is ~/.spamassassin/bayes, which is in each user's home directory. > > Just set the bayes path in your local config to a path which is not based > on the user (i.e. does not start with ~), perhaps something like th

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/22/2012 at 8:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" wrote: >> That's pretty easy. The SA man page says that the default bayes database >> path is ~/.spamassassin/bayes, which is in each user's home directory. >> >> Just set the bayes path in your local config to a path which is not based >> on th

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread Joseph Acquisto
> That's pretty easy. The SA man page says that the default bayes database > path is ~/.spamassassin/bayes, which is in each user's home directory. > > Just set the bayes path in your local config to a path which is not based > on the user (i.e. does not start with ~), perhaps something like th

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: On 10/22/2012 at 7:18 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: On 10/22/2012 at 12:15 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: If I then try to learn ham or spam, it tells me permission denied

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/22/2012 at 7:18 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > > On 10/22/2012 at 12:15 AM, John Hardin wrote: >>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: >>> If I then try to learn ham or spam, it tells me permission denied trying to access t

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: On 10/22/2012 at 12:15 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: If I then try to learn ham or spam, it tells me permission denied trying to access the mail directory. Yeah, that can happen. One way around this for smalle

Re: BAYES_99 score

2012-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 10/23, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti: Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99? If it did, against which database it would do that? It would show the hit rates in the corpora of the masschec

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-22 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/22/2012 at 12:15 AM, John Hardin wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > On 10/21/2012 at 6:39 PM, John Hardin wrote: >>> >>> This typically indicates that you aren't running sa-learn while logged in >>> as the user that SA is running as. >>> >>> Does sa-learn actua

Re: BAYES_99 score

2012-10-22 Thread darxus
On 10/23, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti: > > Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99? > If it did, against which database it would do that? It would show the hit rates in the corpora of the masscheck submitters, like everything else. So, the datab

Re: BAYES_99 score

2012-10-22 Thread Jari Fredriksson
22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti: > Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99? If it did, against which database it would do that? Just askin... -- "I'm out of options for now. It is something that has gone wrong "in the apt-get region" (can't find a good expression for that

Re: SPAMC on Exchange Server

2012-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote: I understand that installing SpamAssassin on Windows is problematic, and I prefer to keep the actual SPAMD process running on my FreeBSD machine. But I was wondering: is there a SPAMC equivalent that I can install into my Exchange server and configure t

Re: BAYES_99 score

2012-10-22 Thread darxus
On 10/22, JP Kelly wrote: > Should I set the BAYES_99 score high enough to trigger as spam? > I get plenty of spam getting through which does not get caught because > BAYES_99 is the only rule which fires and it is not set to score at or above > the threshold. You could. Some people only use ba

BAYES_99 score

2012-10-22 Thread JP Kelly
Should I set the BAYES_99 score high enough to trigger as spam? I get plenty of spam getting through which does not get caught because BAYES_99 is the only rule which fires and it is not set to score at or above the threshold.

SPAMC on Exchange Server

2012-10-22 Thread Tim Gustafson
I understand that installing SpamAssassin on Windows is problematic, and I prefer to keep the actual SPAMD process running on my FreeBSD machine. But I was wondering: is there a SPAMC equivalent that I can install into my Exchange server and configure to connect to SPAMD running on the UNIX box?