On 9/10/12 7:36 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>I wouldn't.
>
>I've seen multiple spam from messagelabs
As I understand it, trusted_networks doesn't mean "networks you trust not
to send spam;" rather, it means "networks you trust not to have forged
their Received: headers." Adding the messagelabs serv
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 18:34 +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
If I understood you correctly I'd need to add all relays of MessageLabs
to trusted_networks and also track any IP address changes...
I wouldn't.
I've seen multiple spam from messagelabs
Mult
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 18:34 +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> If I understood you correctly I'd need to add all relays of MessageLabs
> to trusted_networks and also track any IP address changes...
>
I wouldn't.
I've seen multiple spam from messagelabs
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> > Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > but if their support refuses to tell you, I'd be looking at
> > switching providers
>
> I guess they would if they knew themselves. But project "switch" is
> ongoing... :)
http://images.messagelabs.com/EmailResources
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Helmut Schneider
> wrote:
>
> >> It looks like RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED examines "firstuntrusted" and if he
> >> trusts his MX/relays correctly then this shouldn't be happening.
>
> In general, setting up the trustpath correctly is sufficient.
>
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > If I understood you correctly I'd need to add all relays of
> > MessageLabs to trusted_networks and also track any IP address
> > changes...
>
> If you don't have that info, and their support refuses to tell you,
> tailing your inbound logs for a w
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>> It looks like RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED examines "firstuntrusted" and if he
>> trusts his MX/relays correctly then this shouldn't be happening.
In general, setting up the trustpath correctly is sufficient.
> If I understood you correctly I'd n
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> If I understood you correctly I'd need to add all relays of MessageLabs
> to trusted_networks and also track any IP address changes...
If you're using them as your primary spam filter provider, you should
have information somewhere on which IP block(s) your mail will go
t
Dave Funk wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, John Hardin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > Short story:
> > > Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
> > >
> > > Long story:
> > > We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
> > > inte
John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > Short story:
> > Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
> >
> > Long story:
> > We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
> > internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM external
Dave Funk wrote:
> If he's got his "trusted_networks" configured correctly (has his MX/relays
> listed) shouldn't that take care of the problem?
>
> It looks like RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED examines "firstuntrusted" and if he trusts
> his MX/relays correctly then this shouldn't be happening.
Yes, exactly.
Ram wrote:
> When I ask users to send misclassified mails ( FN or FP ) as an
> attachment , they often dont get it right.
> Also attaching from outlook , windows live mail etc is a big pain
Outlook is not Windows Live Mail.
Backend code rewrites notwithstanding, Windows Live Mail (Windows
7/Vist
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM externally a
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM externally and
forwarded to SA. The mailrelays of the
On 9/10/2012 1:01 PM, Ram wrote:
When I ask users to send misclassified mails ( FN or FP ) as an
attachment , they often dont get it right.
Also attaching from outlook , windows live mail etc is a big pain
Is there an outlook plugin people can use to report spam , that can
come to a URL or by
Hi,
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM externally and
forwarded to SA. The mailrelays of the external provider are listed in
RCVD_IN_DNS
On 09/10/2012 01:01 PM, Ram wrote:
When I ask users to send misclassified mails ( FN or FP ) as an
attachment , they often dont get it right.
Also attaching from outlook , windows live mail etc is a big pain
Is there an outlook plugin people can use to report spam , that can come
to a URL or b
When I ask users to send misclassified mails ( FN or FP ) as an
attachment , they often dont get it right.
Also attaching from outlook , windows live mail etc is a big pain
Is there an outlook plugin people can use to report spam , that can come
to a URL or by mail ?
Thanks
Ram
18 matches
Mail list logo
