On 8/17/2012 11:53 AM, Dave Funk wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 8/17/12 12:11 AM, jonathonb wrote:
As such a detailed knowledge of its history
or inner working is not necessary as I am only interested in YOUR
views and
contributors will remain anonymous.
No, we do
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/17/2012 10:56 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
Basically, I need to do something about the spam inundation, as soon as
possible.
The quickest way I know of to reduce spam is to reject mail at the MTA based
on the zen.spamhaus.org blacklist. I have been
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 8/17/12 12:11 AM, jonathonb wrote:
As such a detailed knowledge of its history
or inner working is not necessary as I am only interested in YOUR views and
contributors will remain anonymous.
No, we do all of this for fame and fortune.
We WANT
On 8/17/2012 11:28 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Ben Johnson wrote:
Would doing so preclude me from creating training folders for individual
IMAP users in the future?
They're not related. Per-user ham and spam training folders doesn't
preclude using those messages for training a
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 8/16/2012 2:00 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
Basically, I need to do something about the spam inundation, as soon as
possible.
Is there any reason that I should NOT be performing the sa-learn
training under the "amavis" user account?
In general, all trainin
On 8/17/2012 10:56 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 8/16/2012 2:00 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
In any event, at this point, I'm confused as to which user account I
should be using when executing "sa-learn --spam", for example.
As a bit of background, I'm using ISPConfig 3, which implements virtual
mailbox
On 8/16/2012 2:00 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> In any event, at this point, I'm confused as to which user account I
> should be using when executing "sa-learn --spam", for example.
>
> As a bit of background, I'm using ISPConfig 3, which implements virtual
> mailbox users via MySQL.
>
> I dug through
* Michael Scheidell :
> On 8/17/12 12:11 AM, jonathonb wrote:
> >As such a detailed knowledge of its history
> >or inner working is not necessary as I am only interested in YOUR views and
> >contributors will remain anonymous.
>
> No, we do all of this for fame and fortune.
> We WANT to see our na
On 8/17/12 12:11 AM, jonathonb wrote:
As such a detailed knowledge of its history
or inner working is not necessary as I am only interested in YOUR views and
contributors will remain anonymous.
No, we do all of this for fame and fortune.
We WANT to see our name in research papers. (preferable i
Hello S.,
Friday, August 17, 2012, 9:40:58 AM, you wrote:
SBpG> Is there a workaround for this?
Change the PTR records to something sensible.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpMsjA37pxXe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08/17/2012 10:40 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote:
Hello,
we are using public static IPs for our servers and are labeling these with
names containing the IP of the servers. Here is an example:
server1.123-123-123-123.domain.tld
In DNS and rDNS zonefiles we are using the same pattern.
The
Hello,
we are using public static IPs for our servers and are labeling these with
names containing the IP of the servers. Here is an example:
server1.123-123-123-123.domain.tld
In DNS and rDNS zonefiles we are using the same pattern.
The problem is that SpamAssassin adds HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D and HEL
12 matches
Mail list logo
