On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:52:45 +0200
Frank Walter wrote:
> There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a
> very small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8). But there is more spam in the
> inbox.
>
> I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned
> it, there would be
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 04:35 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>>
>> This is spamassassin 3.3.1 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS if it matters.
>> And I have a few quick questions:
>>
>> 1) Yesterday I got a lot of messages about non-existent rules:
>>
>> Jun 1 09:49
Hello John,
Friday, June 1, 2012, 3:31:23 PM, you wrote:
JH> One crucial thing you didn't post: you ran the learning as root. Is the
JH> user that spamd is running as also root? The bayes database is
JH> user-specific, and a common problem is to train the database as a
JH> different user than
On 06/01/2012 04:35 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
This is spamassassin 3.3.1 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS if it matters.
And I have a few quick questions:
1) Yesterday I got a lot of messages about non-existent rules:
Jun 1 09:49:23.063 [1730] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existen
This is spamassassin 3.3.1 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS if it matters.
And I have a few quick questions:
1) Yesterday I got a lot of messages about non-existent rules:
Jun 1 09:49:23.063 [1730] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_EF20B
Jun 1 09:49:23.063
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Frank Walter wrote:
There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a very
small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8).
But there is more spam in the inbox.
I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned it, there
would be no question that the Ba
There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a very
small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8).
But there is more spam in the inbox.
I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned it, there
would be no question that the Bayes score for this mail would be high, the
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:52:05 +0200
francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> But when I send an email with the content and Subject of an old
> spam-mail this passes without much bayes-score:
>
> What am I doing wrong?
You are testing a message that's part spam and part non-spam and
expecting BAYES to detec
Hello
I use SpamAssassin 3.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 with Postfix 2.9.1-4 and AMaViS 2.6.5
All the time I move Spam when I get, to my Spam-folder, where I have some spam
together since the last two years.
All night I use the script "salearn-from-mails", to learn from the spam which
is:
#!/bin/bash -
