On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:40:42 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk wrote:
> > Beyes does not make much sense in a multi-user, diverse community
> > such as my university department. Makes sense here (small company;
> > small user base)
> I'll have to disagree with that, as a person running a mail server
> for
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, John ffitch wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, RW wrote:
That's what use_bayes 0 is for.
Unless you really have to, turning-off Bayes is a bad idea. The FP rate
is much higher without it.
Beyes does not make much sense in a multi-user, diverse community such as my
universit
Den 2012-04-21 15:23, John ffitch skrev:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, RW wrote:
That's what use_bayes 0 is for.
Unless you really have to, turning-off Bayes is a bad idea. The FP
rate
is much higher without it.
Beyes does not make much sense in a multi-user, diverse community
such as my univers
On 04/20/2012 11:20 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hello,
i've notice when i set use_bayes 0 then spamc -C report stops to work.
I've got in log: spamd: Can't call method "learn" on an undefined value
at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.12.4/Mail/SpamAs
sassin/PerMsgLearner.pm line 111, line 117.
Wh
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, RW wrote:
That's what use_bayes 0 is for.
Unless you really have to, turning-off Bayes is a bad idea. The FP rate
is much higher without it.
Beyes does not make much sense in a multi-user, diverse community such as
my university department. Makes sense here (small c
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:27:42 +0200
Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> i've notice when i set use_bayes 0 then spamc -C report stops to
> work. I've got in log: spamd: Can't call method "learn" on an
> undefined value
> >>>
> >>> bayes_learn_during_report 0
> >>
> >> Hi darxus,
> >> thanks fo
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:38:32 +0200
Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> W dniu 2012-04-21 04:58, dar...@chaosreigns.com pisze:
> > On 04/20, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> i've notice when i set use_bayes 0 then spamc -C report stops to
> >> work. I've got in log: spamd: Can't call method "learn" on
