On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:07:18PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 08:40:08AM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
> >
> > Try this:
> >
> > body OVERSIZE_COMMENT eval:html_text_match('comment',
> > ').{512,}-->')
>
> No. See what I already posted.
Btw I put few test rules to my sandbox:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 08:40:08AM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
>
> Try this:
>
> body OVERSIZE_COMMENT eval:html_text_match('comment',
> ').{512,}-->')
No. See what I already posted.
On 04/02/2012 09:40 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Can anyone point out what bit of stupidity I'm committing in trying
> to use this:
>
> rawbody OVERSIZE_COMMENTm|).{32000,}|s
>
> to match messages that are mostly very very long HTML comment(s)?
>
> Testing the same regex against the whole ra
On 04/01/2012 06:35 AM, joea wrote:
> While exploring Bayes stuff, (wanting to populate appropriately for
> my setup), found reference to removing headers that might confuse
> Bayes.
>
> Specifically bayes_ignore_header.
>
> The example they show is an X header. Seems the ones spamassassin
> pu
