Well.. it was simscan. But I just check current log and find out that the
score that email got when spamassassin cooperating with simscan is 4.6
(higher than spam-hits, that is 4.0). When I scan manually with
spamassassin -D, it only get 1.7. Is it ok? Thanks.
Regards,
Mario
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012
Den 2012-03-28 06:55, ddodell skrev:
I've tried researching this question without much luck.
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
see trusted_networks
ONLY use this for ips you own self
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
Is there a way to whitelist a specific IP address in spamassas
Spammassin itself doesnt do anything with the email , but merely scores it
for other things to use that score to move it deliver it or send it
somewhere different
So the question is
What is calling spamassassin and what's moving the emails to your
quarantine faculty ??
Martin
On Wednesday, 28 M
I've tried researching this question without much luck.
Is there a way to whitelist a specific IP address in spamassassin.
Be gentle ... I'm new at this.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/WhiteList-an-IP-address--tp33544812p33544812.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin -
One thing I've noticed more of recently is spam sent to multiple
recipients at multiple domains with the same or similar local parts; one
message might go to and
and and so on. Is there a rule or plugin
that helps flag that sort of message?
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
"I
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 21:47 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 27.3.2012 13:08, j...@j4computers.com kirjoitti:
> On 3/26/2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> >> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
> >> getting ?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy McSpad
On 3/22/2012 8:08 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>
> first thanks Michael
>
> i'v found out what my problem was... the -c thing is changing the config
> file loaded.
> i tried to scan it manually using:
> spamassassin -D -t and it got a score of 7.9 but not as my config files.
>
> the debug shows sp
27.3.2012 13:08, j...@j4computers.com kirjoitti:
On 3/26/2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
>> getting ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy McSpadden
>
> Running "/usr/sbin/spamassassin reload" produces
>
> "warn: arch
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
--
"Will I ever learn? I hope not, I'm having too much fun."
- Brent "Minime" Avis, motorcycle.com
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
just noted
--
Benny Pedersen
On 03/27/2012 04:21 PM, j...@j4computers.com wrote:
I see that, to report SPAM and have spamassassin "learn", I can do
"spamassassin -r< message.txt".
However, it is not clear what form "message.txt" should take.
Since, by the time my mail client receives the missed SPAM, it has
been altered f
However, this link -> http://gtmp.org/doku.php/pub_sa-postfix.en.html
says there is nothing to see here . . . move along . . . move along . . .
>>> "j...@j4computers.com" 03/27/12 10:27 AM >>>
And, if I had read a bit further, I would have seen the bit about setting up
postfix alias(s) for ju
And, if I had read a bit further, I would have seen the bit about setting up
postfix alias(s) for just this purpose.
Sorry for the bother. Still, suggestions welcome.
>>> "j...@j4computers.com" 03/27/12 10:23 AM >>>
I see that, to report SPAM and have spamassassin "learn", I can do
"spamass
I see that, to report SPAM and have spamassassin "learn", I can do
"spamassassin -r < message.txt".
However, it is not clear what form "message.txt" should take. Since, by the
time my mail client receives the missed SPAM, it has been altered from its
"native" internet email form, I will have
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:08:02 -0400
j...@j4computers.com wrote:
> >>> On 3/26/2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy McSpadden
> >>> wrote:
> > Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error
> > are you getting ?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy McSpadden
>
> Running "/usr/sbin/spamassassin reloa
Duane Hill wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 02:48:08 UTC, jer...@fluxlabs.net confabulated:
>
>> > Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
>> > getting ?
> You have to reload spamd after sa-update if any rules were updated to
> activate the changes.
>
I
>>> On 3/26/2012 at 11:21 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 02:48:08 UTC, jer...@fluxlabs.net confabulated:
>
>> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
> getting ?
>
> You have to reload spamd after sa-update if any rules were updated to
>
>>> On 3/26/2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
> getting ?
>
>
> --
> Jeremy McSpadden
Running "/usr/sbin/spamassassin reload" produces
"warn: archive-iterator: unable to open reload: No such file or directory
18 matches
Mail list logo