Since we are on the subject of adding "magic links" to email header to
make it easier for nontech staff to report spam.
I don't understand how to extract the tokinzed data needed to represent
the specific email.
Have I missed some plugin that everyone else knows about?
The rest of the problem seem
On 3/21/12 6:19 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I know that and I wanted to add some more score when there is no SPF
record
its possible to do this with Spamassassin ?
I'm not aware of a "no spf record rule" but the underlying plugin
looks to support what you want. I think you might find that t
I'm going to add this to the default rules with a score 0 so you can
then just give it a score you want.
I also added spf_helo_none
svn commit -m 'Added a default rule for SPF_NONE that is disabled with
Score 0 for administrators to activate'
Sendingrules/25_spf.cf
Sendingru
I know that and I wanted to add some more score when there is no SPF
record
its possible to do this with Spamassassin ?
I'm not aware of a "no spf record rule" but the underlying plugin looks
to support what you want. I think you might find that to be a poorly
performing rule except in meta
Den 2012-03-21 23:00, Piotr Kloc skrev:
The Domain in the From in the envelope, ameriton.com, doesn't
publish an SPF Record:
I know that and I wanted to add some more score when there is no SPF
record
its possible to do this with Spamassassin ?
meta NO_SPF_ON_SENDER_DOMAIN (!SPF_PASS || !SP
> The Domain in the From in the envelope, ameriton.com, doesn't publish an SPF
> Record:
>
I know that and I wanted to add some more score when there is no SPF record
its possible to do this with Spamassassin ?
Piotr
On 3/21/2012 5:48 PM, Piotr Kloc wrote:
Hello !
I have question why Spamassasssin doesnt add the header SPF_FAIL in
X-Spam-Status ?
s61:~# cat sa.log |grep -i spf
mar 21 22:42:40.285 [20073] dbg: config: read file
/usr/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf
mar 21 22:42:40.287 [20073] dbg: config: rea
The message I have tested is spam and I want to add some score when the SPF
failed
but my X-Spam-Status looks like
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=DYN_RDNS_SHORT_HELO_HTML,
FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_I
Den 2012-03-21 13:38, Michael Scheidell skrev:
so, what would you manually learn?
using dspam then its not a problem, it only needs dspam signature
internet > postfix > dspam > postfix > exchange relay transport
now exchange have the dspam signature and can report back if its spam
or ham, h
Hello !
I have question why Spamassasssin doesnt add the header SPF_FAIL in
X-Spam-Status ?
s61:~# cat sa.log |grep -i spf
mar 21 22:42:40.285 [20073] dbg: config: read file
/usr/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf
mar 21 22:42:40.287 [20073] dbg: config: read file
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitel
Den 2012-03-21 14:07, Jari Fredriksson skrev:
don't use public forwarders. unless you are doing 100K dns queries
per
day, just use bind and root zones.
if you want information on how to fix bind, then you need the bind
faq/man page/news group.
agre
I used public forwarderds because app call
On 3/21/2012 11:42 AM, Adrian Gruntkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems with bayes database. When I issue "spamassassin --lint
-D", I see a following phrase: "bayes: not available for scanning, only 0
spam(s) in bayes DB< 200".
However, a bit further I see this: "corpus size: nspam = 5987
Hello,
I'm having problems with bayes database. When I issue "spamassassin --lint
-D", I see a following phrase: "bayes: not available for scanning, only 0
spam(s) in bayes DB < 200".
However, a bit further I see this: "corpus size: nspam = 59870, nham =
185841". What can be the cause of such b
21.3.2012 16:45, Per Jessen kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>> I get this in SpamAssassin report:
>>
>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
>> DNSWL
>> was blocked. See
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dns
On 03/21, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
> was blocked. See
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
> for more information.
This is plenty on top
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:41:31 -0400
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> But, what do you do about an email that was forwarded to someone else?
> And, that someone else has one of those silly anti-malware plugins
> that surfs to every url in any inbound email?
By default, our system won't allow training un
On 3/21/2012 10:41 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/21/12 9:57 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Very elegant IMO. I'd love to look at moving some of the framework
to support this into SA. Any objections? Won't be anything quick
but it's a really great idea.
We thought about this once.
add (ie
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> I get this in SpamAssassin report:
>
> 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
> DNSWL
> was blocked. See
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
> for more
On 3/21/12 9:57 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Very elegant IMO. I'd love to look at moving some of the framework to
support this into SA. Any objections? Won't be anything quick but
it's a really great idea.
We thought about this once.
add (ie: modify body of email) with 'report spam', 'blac
On 3/21/2012 10:03 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:57:33 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
[Storing Bayes tokens on the server and retrieving them when training]
Very elegant IMO. I'd love to look at moving some of the framework
to support this into SA. Any objections? Won't
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:57:33 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
[Storing Bayes tokens on the server and retrieving them when training]
> Very elegant IMO. I'd love to look at moving some of the framework
> to support this into SA. Any objections? Won't be anything quick
> but it's a really great
On 3/21/2012 9:30 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Actually, there's a third way and it's what we do (but difficult to
set up with pure SpamAssassin.) We tokenize inbound messages and store
the tokens on the server. In each message, we add links for doing
training. When you click on a training link, t
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:44:49 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Mangling data by exchange is a big. problem when trying to filter
> spam in front of it. I see two ways to avoid this problem:
> - use spam server for exchange. We use one from GFI, with quite good
> results.
> - you can use spa
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:06:58 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:38:49 +0100
> >Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >No, it isn't. Bayes is a statistical filter it needs to learn a lot
> >of diverse spam and ham to reach it's optimum accuracy. It's been
> >demonstrated on Bo
On 3/21/2012 9:07 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I used public forwarderds because app called "namebench" told me that
they are faster. I need bind for my own LAN, but the rest is server as
is fastest. One is google, other another public one, not google. zone
solutions is how I have it now. Let us
21.3.2012 14:40, Michael Scheidell kirjoitti:
> On 3/21/12 8:24 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> I use public DNS services as forwarders in my LAN dns (bind9). I
>> remember that once disabled forwarders for some URIBL but the setting is
>> gone, and I can't find a recipe.
>>
>> Howto?
>>
> don't use
Am 21.03.2012 13:39, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> On 21.03.12 14:24, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> I get this in SpamAssassin report:
>>
>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
>>was blocked. See
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamass
On 3/21/2012 8:24 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I get this in SpamAssassin report:
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
fo
On 3/21/12 5:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there are two problems when requiring users to manually learn on
everythhing.
- it's more work to implement
- it's more work for users to do the training.
On 21.03.12 08:38, Michael Scheidell wrote:
and, if 95% of the users are using microsoft
On 3/21/12 8:24 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I use public DNS services as forwarders in my LAN dns (bind9). I
remember that once disabled forwarders for some URIBL but the setting is
gone, and I can't find a recipe.
Howto?
don't use public forwarders. unless you are doing 100K dns queries per
d
On 21.03.12 14:24, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I get this in SpamAssassin report:
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more
On 3/21/12 5:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there are two problems when requiring users to manually learn on
everythhing.
- it's more work to implement
- it's more work for users to do the training.
and, if 95% of the users are using microsoft exchange, exchange will
horribly mangle the h
I get this in SpamAssassin report:
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
I use public DNS services as
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:38:49 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You can of course configure mailer to train automatically on anything
received/delivered. However this would apparently cause much more
FP's and FN's rate than letting user train only those that misfire.
On 10.03.12 00:07, RW wrot
Axb wrote:
> SOUGHT rule updates are working again.
That is truly wonderful news! The last update I had was from
2011-11-10. Looking forward to the revivied goodness!
> Thanks JM!
Yes. Thanks!
Bob
Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>
> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>
> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>
> You should check your status update and see if it changed
> This method of
Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
You should check your status update and see if it changed
This method of language learning is super easy.
Please confirm that this
37 matches
Mail list logo
