On 02/24/2012 06:23 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
> receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set invisible"
> in the "global" section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
> spamassassin consider my
Am 24.02.2012 15:00, schrieb RW:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:32:35 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> > I am not realy sure if this fixes your problem but i have set
>> >
>> > score RDNS_NONE 0
>> >
>> > cause the "default" points at this parameter looks like nonsense to me
>> > i have also a scena
24.2.2012 13:23, Michelle Konzack kirjoitti:
> In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
> receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set invisible"
> in the "global" section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
> spamassassin consider my ma
On 2/24/2012 6:23 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
> receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set invisible"
> in the "global" section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
> spamassassin consider my mails a
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:23:21 +0100
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem
> (the receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set
> invisible" in the "global" section)
That doesn't sound like like a optimum solution unless you're
Am 24.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
> receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set invisible"
> in the "global" section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
> spamassassin consider my
In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding "set invisible"
in the "global" section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
spamassassin consider my mails as spam du to the received headers...
Scenario:
Hi
I get T_DKIM_INVALID and no SPF_PASS on one of my mailserver
see below the relevant headers from a=>b and b=>a
difference between both machines is the running FreeBSD version and the
perl version
perl is 5.8.9 and the other is 5.14.2
(the latter which gives DKIM_INVALID and no SPF_PASS)
b