On 2011/12/21 14:31, RW wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:20:09 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/21/2011 9:11 AM, RW wrote:
Matthias Andree, a fetchmail maintainer, tried to have it
deprecated and removed from the FreeBSD ports tree:
Good luck. Did the people who speak fluent .procmailrc tr
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Its rank, and S/O, are not particularly impressive:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20111217&rule=RP_MATCHES_RCVD
Rules that hit far more ham than spam have utility as well...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impse
RW wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > Matthias Andree, a fetchmail maintainer, tried to have it
> > > deprecated and removed from the FreeBSD ports tree:
> >
> > Good luck. Did the people who speak fluent .procmailrc try and tar
> > and feather him? ;-)
>
> One did, but it turne
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:37:24 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> 2) Because the re-scorer thinks this rule is useful enough in blocking
>spams that it's worth the occasional missed spam it causes. Would
> you rather get as many spams as you do, and have them all hit
>RP_MATCHES_RCVD, o
On 12/21, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
But your question may actually be a very good one, which might, in the
end, come down to: Why isn't RP_MATCHES_RCVD flagged as mutable and
having optimal scores generated based on masscheck data?
On 21.12.11 13:37, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I take t
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:20:09 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 9:11 AM, RW wrote:
> > Matthias Andree, a fetchmail maintainer, tried to have it
> > deprecated and removed from the FreeBSD ports tree:
> Good luck. Did the people who speak fluent .procmailrc try and tar
> and feather h
On 12/21/2011 5:24 PM, Jonas wrote:
> Alright that sounds as a fix at least, but do you not agree that it should
be a
user configurable setting? As in some sort of parameter or conf file?
I would support a bug to make that a user configurable setting. Please open it
with more details about
> > Alright that sounds as a fix at least, but do you not agree that it should
> be a
> user configurable setting? As in some sort of parameter or conf file?
>
> I would support a bug to make that a user configurable setting. Please open
> it
> with more details about what you are trying to do
Am 21.12.2011 19:10, schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>> I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
>> Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
>> configured to talk to it.
>>
>> I'm running big servers with lots of ram and raid 0 flash d
Am 21.12.2011 18:20, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> I should have mentions I'm filtering for about 50K users.
ok, thats a lot, changing away from mysql may help
but for so many users, things are going difficult in many ways
but thats not direct related by working bayes and mysql
i use it for 3K users no P
On 12/21, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> But your question may actually be a very good one, which might, in the
> end, come down to: Why isn't RP_MATCHES_RCVD flagged as mutable and
> having optimal scores generated based on masscheck data?
I take that back, I think all the scores in 72_scores.c
On 12/21, Jan Agermose wrote:
>Ive not checked what other mail we are scanning that also hits this and
>related rules: RP_MATCHES_RCVD - but when ever I actually do get spam on
>my own mailaccount its always casino mail and always getting marked as
>non-spam because of rules like th
On 2011/12/21 04:34, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/21/2011 12:39 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/12/20 18:51, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
My .procmailrc in my home directory has MAILDIR=/home/spool/mail :-)
What about /etc/procmailrc?
I would post the contents of both.
It makes a difference how proc
Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
configured to talk to it.
I'm running big servers with lots of ram and raid 0 flash drives for
speed. Also using InnoDB. I'm beginning to won
I should have mentions I'm filtering for about 50K users.
On 12/21/2011 8:54 AM, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
Bayes in MySQL works great for my with only one user !
In my previous setup with per user bayes in mysql was a mess !
Cheers
Christian
2011/12/21 Robert Schetterer:
Am 21.12.2011 15:39,
Bayes in MySQL works great for my with only one user !
In my previous setup with per user bayes in mysql was a mess !
Cheers
Christian
2011/12/21 Robert Schetterer :
> Am 21.12.2011 15:39, schrieb Marc Perkel:
>> I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
>> Running a d
On 12/21/2011 9:11 AM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:34:36 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Actually, procmail is Sendmail's Local Delivery Agent. It *is* the
part of Sendmail that delivers the mail to specific folders.
I don't know whether that was historically true, but procmail is a
separ
Am 21.12.2011 15:39, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
> Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
> configured to talk to it.
>
> I'm running big servers with lots of ram and raid 0 flash drives for
> speed. Also u
On 12/21/2011 03:39 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
configured to talk to it.
I'm running big servers with lots of ram and raid 0 flash drives for
speed. Also using Inno
I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
configured to talk to it.
I'm running big servers with lots of ram and raid 0 flash drives for
speed. Also using InnoDB. I'm beginning to wonder if it is ever
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:34:36 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Actually, procmail is Sendmail's Local Delivery Agent. It *is* the
> part of Sendmail that delivers the mail to specific folders.
I don't know whether that was historically true, but procmail is a
separate project, and one that has be
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Jan Agermose wrote:
Ive not checked what other mail we are scanning that also hits this and
related rules: RP_MATCHES_RCVD - but when ever I actually do get spam on
my own mailaccount its always casino mail and always getting marked as
non-spam because of rules like this o
On 12/21/2011 12:39 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/12/20 18:51, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
My .procmailrc in my home directory has MAILDIR=/home/spool/mail :-)
What about /etc/procmailrc?
I would post the contents of both.
It makes a difference how procmail is called. It is a filter. It takes an
in
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:39:23 +0100, Jan Agermose wrote:
to me that sounds strange. How can all my spam come from hosts that
spamassassin thinks are nice hosts :) ?
this is nothing to do with trusted_networks at all
it only means that the sender host you get it from have done more
homework th
Hello folks!,
I have a box running freebsd with SpamAssassin and FuzzyOcr plugin, I have
noted that it doen't work fine, the body/description of rules of FuzzyOcr is
empty ever, I have googling and I have found that the SpamAssassin version
3.2.4 not is compatible with the FuzzyOcr 3.4 and I must
On 21.12.11 09:39, Jan Agermose wrote:
Ive not checked what other mail we are scanning that also hits this
and related rules: RP_MATCHES_RCVD - but when ever I actually do get
spam on my own mailaccount its always casino mail and always getting
marked as non-spam because of rules like this one
HI
Ive not checked what other mail we are scanning that also hits this and related
rules: RP_MATCHES_RCVD - but when ever I actually do get spam on my own
mailaccount its always casino mail and always getting marked as non-spam
because of rules like this one and others that seams related sayin
27 matches
Mail list logo
