On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:30:31 +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham
folder for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks
headers in thing like outlook)
yes, here i found that dovecot-antispam helpfull in the way that users
ju
Am 16.12.2011 12:59, schrieb Ram:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 10:20 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 09.12.2011 13:58, schrieb Ram:
>>> If I want to mark *all* invite mails as spam
>>>
>>> linkedin, WAYN , facebook , google+ or anything else.
>>>
>>> Is there a global way of doing this
>>>
>>
Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham folder
for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks headers in thing
like outlook)
Then find one of the many perl scripts lying about the net to grab this
email and SA-learn it to the main bayes db.
Martin
On Friday,
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 10:20 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 09.12.2011 13:58, schrieb Ram:
> > If I want to mark *all* invite mails as spam
> >
> > linkedin, WAYN , facebook , google+ or anything else.
> >
> > Is there a global way of doing this
> >
> >
> >
> my short solution was bl
Hi all,
I have some spamtraps which get lots of spam. After a few precautions, I
use sa-learn to train a single Bayes profile. This profile is used for
many of my users. A significant amount of other users maintain their own
Bayes profiles, and I'd like to make this training apply to their
pr
On 12/15/2011 1:44 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, agamemnus wrote:
One thing that would really help is to discard any emails where the "to"
doesn't match the "for" fields: 99% of my spam is like that. Can
anyone tell
me what the rule for this would be? Thanks!
Sample headers wo
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, agamemnus wrote:
One thing that would really help is to discard any emails where the "to"
doesn't match the "for" fields: 99% of my spam is like that. Can anyone tell
me what the rule for this would be? Thanks!
Sample headers would help.
By "for" do you mean the envelope
On 12/15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> In that case I'm missing some information: how to write a rule that can
> interpret the value(s) returned by TextCat.
I think you're looking for:
ok_languages en fr de
-
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_TextCat.html
> Why
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:57 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 12/15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > The problem that needs addressing is that the ok_locales configuration
> > parameter doesn't work. This appears to be because it thinks the
> > sender's choice of (in Windows terms) the character
On 12/15/2011 11:57 AM, agamemnus wrote:
A while ago, I made the mistake of trusting a certain small company with my
email addresses. They were since compromised and I have had thousands of
spam emails in the years since... (I told them about it; no response
whatsoever.)
One thing that would rea
On 12/15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> The problem that needs addressing is that the ok_locales configuration
> parameter doesn't work. This appears to be because it thinks the
> sender's choice of (in Windows terms) the character translation code
> page is a reliable indication of the sender's locale.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:14:18 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:58 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > I wonder why SA disables DNWSL rules, with this logic blacklists,
> > not whitelists, should be disabled...
> >
>
>
> Personally, I think all whitelists should be dis
Personally, I think all whitelists should be disabled by default (I
disabled all whitelists as of some years ago, and occasionally check
to see no new ones has cropped up).
That way is someone wants to allow others to decide who they can trust
(always a bad idea IMHO, trust to each networks
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 23:36 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 12/15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > Could somebody with access to the SA Bugzilla kindly add a comment to
> > bug 4078 saying that this is also an issue with Cyrillic encoded in
> > UTF-8? I'm asking because at present #4078 only m
14 matches
Mail list logo
