If I want to mark *all* invite mails as spam
linkedin, WAYN , facebook , google+ or anything else.
Is there a global way of doing this
On 12/08/2011 03:51 PM, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
> I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
> Does it exist?
Most of the body rules in previous versions of SpamAssassin were phased
out because the Bayesian filter does a *significantly* better job at
that sort of thing. The few that remain tar
On 12/09, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
>I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
>Does it exist?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets includes "French Rules",
but its status is listed as "defunct".
--
"Life is either a daring adventure or it is nothing at all."
- Helen Ke
Hi
I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
Does it exist?
Regards
Stan
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:41:49 +0100, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
>
>
>http-equiv="Content-Type">
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I use the plugin
> text OCR with
>class="hps">spamassassin and
> amavisd-new
>
>Doc:class="moz-txt
Hi,
I use the plugin text OCR with spamassassin and amavisd-new
Doc: http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/OCR
And it happens that there are several process gocr-consuming a lot of
cpuand block my server
Do you have an idea or already had the problem?
What is the best solution to scan mes
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:48:10 +0100
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I get this message:
>
> [21120] dbg: message: X-Envelope-From header found after 1 or more
> Received lines, cannot trust envelope-from
>
> ...
>
> When all headers above X-Envelope-From are from trusted sources, this
> header should al
On Thursday, December 1, 2011, 10:11:35 AM, Darxus Darxus wrote:
> On 12/01, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Also keep in mind that PH has a generally low score even for net
>> + bayes since it doesn't hit a large portion of spam in the SA
>> corpus.
> No. Scores are not determined by how many spams a rule
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
If you're trying to match on RFC822 attached emails, you'll need to
use the "mimeheader" rule type,
I am afraid this does not apply to Received: headers.
On 08.12.11 06:26, John Hardin wrote:
It shouldn't apply
On 2011-12-08 16:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
If you're trying to match on RFC822 attached emails, you'll need to
use the "mimeheader" rule type,
I am afraid this does not apply to Received: headers.
On 08.12.11 06:26, John Hardin wrote
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
If you're trying to match on RFC822 attached emails, you'll need
to use the "mimeheader" rule type,
I am afraid this does not apply to Received: headers.
On 08.12.11 06:26, John Hardin wrote:
It shouldn't apply to any of the headers in the at
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
If you're trying to match on RFC822 attached emails, you'll need to use the
"mimeheader" rule type,
I am afraid this does not apply to Received: headers.
It shouldn't apply to any of the headers in the attached message.
mimeheader is for th
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have made a few rules to match bodies of e-mail forwarded to our abuse
account. they should match if IP from our range appears in the abuse
report:
body __GTSSK_IP04 /\b213\.215\.(6[4-9]|[7-9][0-9]|1[01][0-9]|12[0-7])\.\d/
should match any IP from range 213.215.6
13 matches
Mail list logo