On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:16 +, Tom wrote:
> > (apologies if the html doesn't end up translating well!)
Damn, sorry. My attempt at pruning the large tables seriously fucked up
the formatting. :/
> > output from top, after running
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:16 +, Tom wrote:
> Here's the stats from my cluster at the moment (8am) (these figures wll
> ramp up considerably!) (apologies if the html doesn't end up
> translating well!)
>
> Server
> Load Avg
> Processed/Min
> Busy Child Proc
> Proc Time
> 10.44.219.192
> 0.34
> 4
On 11/17/2011 10:27 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm exploring a variety of ideas to determine the difference between
> "serious" domains down to throw away domains used by spammers. The ideas
> I'm presenting here are not complete but are just a conversation starter.
I'd think domain age would be big
