> From:... <...@1004.con>
".con"? sounds like a con-job.
Ha, I'm not falling for that again!
apologies in advance for asking
i know part of the answer can be found in the wiki, yet it isnt 100%
definative.
have these older FVGT rulesets been incorporated into the current SA
versions?
i.e. 00_FVGT_File001.cf and 88_FVGT_headers.cf and 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
we shouldnt be using these rule
On 11/8/2011 2:38 AM, João Gouveia wrote:
AFAIK, that's a commercial plugin.
Also, from what I remember of that plugin, it actually sends the complete
pristine message to their datacenter for analysis, which might not be what
you're expecting.
I can't speak to that particular plug-in, but in
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 03:47:50PM +, RW wrote:
> >
> > Well, if you care about performance, I recoded iXhash to use async
> > lookups and few other enhancements..
> >
> > http://sa.hege.li/iXhash2.pm
>
> or would it need separate rules:
>
> ixhashdnsbl IXHASH_M ix.dnsbl.manitu.net.
>
On 10/20/11 8:24 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 04:43 AM, Mynabbler wrote:
>> You are kidding, right? 50% of this crap comes from FREEMAIL
>> addresses, and even more specific: 44% of this crap is delivered by
>> aol.com. The aol deliveries have about 85% unique from@aol
>> addresses, so the
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:57:38 +0200
Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:28:55PM +, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:27:36 +0100
> > Axb wrote:
> >
> > > Although "unsupported/obsolete" the iXhash plugin still produces
> > > good results.
> >
> > I removed that plugin a few month a
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:28:55PM +, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:27:36 +0100
> Axb wrote:
>
> > Although "unsupported/obsolete" the iXhash plugin still produces good
> > results.
>
> I removed that plugin a few month ago because it reduced scan times from
> ~14s to ~4s.
>
> I've jus
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:27:36 +0100
Axb wrote:
> Although "unsupported/obsolete" the iXhash plugin still produces good
> results.
I removed that plugin a few month ago because it reduced scan times from
~14s to ~4s.
I've just been looking at it again and it look like iXhash.cf contains
some obso
R - elists wrote:
>
> why not just save processor cycles & make it easier... reject the below at
> smtp time
>
> sms.ac
> fanbox.com
> fanboxnotes.com
> myfanbox.com
>
We have a ruleset here, since I want to see what they send, and your list is
incomplete:
header MN_FANBOX From =~
/(smsacfri
On 2011-11-08 12:23, Hajo Locke wrote:
Hello,
AFAIK, that's a commercial plugin.
Also, from what I remember of that plugin, it actually sends the
complete pristine message to their datacenter for analysis, which
might not be what you're expecting.
yes, its commercial. i do some tests with tes
Hello,
AFAIK, that's a commercial plugin.
Also, from what I remember of that plugin, it actually sends the complete
pristine message to their datacenter for analysis, which might not be what
you're expecting.
yes, its commercial. i do some tests with testlicence but i dont see the
obvious a
- Original Message -
> From: "Hajo Locke"
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 10:11:38 AM
> Subject: anti spam plugin
>
> Hello,
>
> i do some tests with commtouch anti spam plugin for spamassassin.
> http://www.commtouch.com/
> Somebody knows this pro
Hello,
i do some tests with commtouch anti spam plugin for spamassassin.
http://www.commtouch.com/
Somebody knows this product? In my opinion a Spamassassin with razor plugin
is enough.
It seems that its just strengthen the spamscore spamassassin created on its
own but is less helpful at diffi
13 matches
Mail list logo
