Re: sa-learn question

2011-10-28 Thread RW
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:24:47 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 28.10.2011 4:38, Ricardo Ardila Vetrovec kirjoitti: > > on the spamassassin server i create a mail box so users can > > redirect the emails they consider spam > ... > > question is: is this method works? with the redirection of the mail

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:05 +0200, Loic Condette wrote: > > > [DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1=0.001, HELO_NO_DOMAIN=0.001, > > > RDNS_NONE=0.793, TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS=0.001] > > and most rules do have textual > > descriptions available that can be displayed in the message header given

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread RW
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Loic Condette wrote: > Well, honestly, please forgive me but I'm not (yet) the kind to be > able to decode your sig. > Does that mean that i do not have the right to use SA? > > You probably should hunt cellphone users for using their cellphone > without

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 17:29 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > On 10/28, Loic Condette wrote: > > > and most rules do have textual > > > descriptions available that can be displayed in the message header given > > > the proper config options. > > > > Do you (or anyone else) know what the prope

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Loic Condette wrote: Additionally, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 description is rather unclear, to say the least. Heh. That one probably duplicates HELO_NO_DOMAIN. "FDQN" is net-speak for "Fully-Qualified Domain Name". Indeed, it's just that the rule's description on SA looks like

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:10 +0200, Loic Condette wrote: > > > I just received a spam which match the following rules: > > > > Are we really talking about a single spam message that slipped past SA? > > Yes, indeed. May I ask why? Mostly just curious and making sure we're on the same page. Howeve

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread darxus
On 10/28, Loic Condette wrote: > > and most rules do have textual > > descriptions available that can be displayed in the message header given > > the proper config options. > > Do you (or anyone else) know what the proper config options are? report Report = _REPORT_ Or you can just run the emai

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread Loic Condette
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 02:07 +0200, Loic Condette wrote: >> I just received a spam which match the following rules: > > Are we really talking about a single spam message that slipped past SA? Yes, indeed. May I ask why? > >> The problem here is that I could not find a description for the >> fol

Re: Rules explanations?

2011-10-28 Thread Loic Condette
Hi again list John, thanks a lot for your answer and help, that is greatly appreciated :) > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Loic Condette wrote: > >> I just received a spam which match the following rules: >> >> [DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1=0.001, >> HELO_NO_DOMAIN=0.001, >> RDNS_NONE=0.79

Re: sa-learn question

2011-10-28 Thread Jari Fredriksson
28.10.2011 4:38, Ricardo Ardila Vetrovec kirjoitti: > Greetings list! > > Excuse my english, is not so good. > > I have a spamassasin standalone server, my MX it is another server > > postfix query spamassassin for score and work greats > > My question it's about spam that is not recognize

Re: real world spamassassin experiences re: processing on servers emailing from .info domains

2011-10-28 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 27.10.2011 18:15, schrieb R - elists: > > greetings SA users > > there sure seems to be a lot of from .info server spamming > > wierd temp registered .info domains spamming eh? > > for those of you with volume, large or small, care to share an SA tips on > how you deal with .info domains? >