easier than that !
you dont need to check any ratio at all ... as legitimate mails dont
have non-word characters between characters !
Non spamer people don´t write subjects like that !
Spamers had to do that in order to avoid sex, porn, xxx, viagra
directly in subject (which is more or less easily
On 10/15, John Hardin wrote:
> >Subject: T !r (a -n*n =l&e ` S !e .x|
> >Subject: Se^x M-o ^v ~l e -
>
> More chickenpoxed subjects.
Might be fun to create a plugin to check the ratio of word characters to
non-word characters, possibly roughly based on html_title_subject_ratio()
in Mail::SpamAssa
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:58:25 -0400
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 11-10-16 03:37 PM, RW wrote:
> >
> > Could you not just run a script from cron that does chown
> > ${USER}:spamd and chmod g+rw on all the files in the virtual home
> > directories.
>
> You seem to have gotten lost in minor details
On 16/10/11 19:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 20:02 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I may never know they sent me an email.
Unless I spend time going over my logs.
ah you have logs ? :=)
A possible way out is to process the logs overnight, possibly as part of
logwatch, and b
On 11-10-16 03:37 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Could you not just run a script from cron that does chown ${USER}:spamd
> and chmod g+rw on all the files in the virtual home directories.
You seem to have gotten lost in minor details and lost sight on the
original problem which is that of being able to run sp
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:24:17 -0400
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> To recap, I simply want to have the user_state (i.e. typically
> ~/.spamassassin) dirs somewhere other than $HOME on the server but
> have those dirs and their files owned by their respective users and
> therefor need to have spamd run
On 11-10-16 03:12 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Not if you set --virtual-config-dir.
Right. But such a change (i.e. a different $HOME on the server than on
any other machine) is still on the "transparent to users" change that I
am looking for -- the change that requires no user re-training and no
increase i
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:31:01 -0400
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 11-10-16 02:08 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > Yep. A brainfart on my part.
>
> No worries. :-)
>
> > OK - if the MTA runs spamc (Postfix does this via a service defined
> > as part of its configuration - others MTAs have a similar
On 11-10-16 02:08 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Yep. A brainfart on my part.
No worries. :-)
> OK - if the MTA runs spamc (Postfix does this via a service defined as
> part of its configuration - others MTAs have a similar ability) the -u
> facility can be used to select the preference file much
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 20:02 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > I may never know they sent me an email.
> > Unless I spend time going over my logs.
>
> ah you have logs ? :=)
>
A possible way out is to process the logs overnight, possibly as part of
logwatch, and build a datastore of addresses that
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 13:39 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 11-10-16 01:31 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> > Have you thought of running spamc remotely? This way you could avoid the
> > need to login the the server just to process mail.
>
> Hrm. I'm not sure I follow. The server receives th
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:11:21 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
I'm not really a fan of blacklisting an entire domain.
here this is not a problem since i just get the spam in junk folder
with a sieve rule, so no loose for me
If it is a
domain that for sure is 100% spam or close to it then sure.
th
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:07:11 -0300
Christian Grunfeld wrote:
> > spamd: cannot use --virtual-config-dir without -u
>
> afaik --virtual-config-dir needs -x and not -u.but you are
> right ! its at the end of --virtual-config-dir man !
You use both, the -u in spamd determines the unprivileg
On 11-10-16 01:31 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> Have you thought of running spamc remotely? This way you could avoid the
> need to login the the server just to process mail.
Hrm. I'm not sure I follow. The server receives the mail and the
server delivers it to the user's mailbox but on the way
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 12:26 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I don't call spamd from the deliver end. Each user has a .procmailrc
> which pipes the mail through "spamc" so spamc is already being called by
> the recipients effective user-ID.
>
Have you thought of running spamc remotely? This way y
Oh I remember ! I did something like your setup but with the use of
amavisd-new !
Amavis does not need spamd nor spamc as it directly uses spamassassin
perl library functions. With amavis you can also set -u and it worked
for me time ago.
Anyway then I move to SQL !
2011/10/16 Christian Grunfeld
> spamd: cannot use --virtual-config-dir without -u
afaik --virtual-config-dir needs -x and not -u.but you are
right ! its at the end of --virtual-config-dir man !
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:39:42 -0700
> From: jhar...@impsec.org
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't anything at all get these botnet spammers?
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 15:38 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Sat, 15
On 11-10-16 12:16 PM, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
>
> You should have spamd running as root,
But I do that already. That is what is causing the problem with the new
switch (--virtual-config-dir=...):
spamd: cannot use --virtual-config-dir without -u
> then it can setuid to the
> calling spamc ui
> In my network, users have their home dirs on their local machines (for
> performance) which are automounted to the mail server for purposes of
> spamd accessing their ~/.spamassassin dirs.
>
> This of course fails when a machine is turned off so I want to move
> users' ~/.spamassassin dirs to the
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 15:38 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Jenny Lee wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Subject: T !r (a -n*n =l&e ` S !e .x|
Subject: Se^x M-o ^v ~l e -
What about something like:
he
Hi,
In my network, users have their home dirs on their local machines (for
performance) which are automounted to the mail server for purposes of
spamd accessing their ~/.spamassassin dirs.
This of course fails when a machine is turned off so I want to move
users' ~/.spamassassin dirs to the serve
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:12:59 -0700
Paul Cabot wrote:
> The freemailer to freemailer idea is good.Chances are that is
> more likely to be spam.
It's separate freemail "from" and "reply-to" that's a good indicator,
not "from" and "to". In fraud spams they commonly use a different
account for
On 16/10/2011 12:13 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
address to some other account that is not mine.
First off I'm p...@topguncomputers.com. I also run the
On 15/10/2011 5:56 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:40:48 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
blacklist_from *@aol.com
whitelist_from_spf good-us...@aol.com
users can then get a new url for free :-)
Would that not blacklist everyone from aol.com unless I specifically
allowed them with the
>>
>> I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
>> either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
>> address to some other account that is not mine.
>>
>> First off I'm p...@topguncomputers.com. I also run the postfix servers.
>>
>> Usually
26 matches
Mail list logo
