On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:40:48 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
blacklist_from *@aol.com
whitelist_from_spf good-us...@aol.com
users can then get a new url for free :-)
Would that not blacklist everyone from aol.com unless I specifically
allowed them with the whitelist_from_spf setting?
currect
if it
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 16:39 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
> On 15/10/2011 3:39 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > > Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
> > > addressed to me.
> >
> > ...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
Or these very list posts, addressing the que
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 15:38 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Jenny Lee wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Is there any way to get these people?
>
> > Subject: T !r (a -n*n =l&e ` S !e .x|
> > Subject: Se^x M-o ^v ~l e -
>
What about something like:
header POX Subject ~= /[!\(-
On 15/10/2011 3:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:07 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me
from either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a
"to" address to some other account that is not mine.
blackli
On 15/10/2011 3:39 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
addressed to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
Didn't think about the fact that it would be because of me being a BCC.
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT), John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
addressed to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
blacklist_to *@aol.com
:-)
eg if header to contains sp
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:07 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me
from either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a
"to" address to some other account that is not mine.
blacklist_from *@aol.com
whitelist_from_spf good-us..
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really addressed
to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 p
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Jenny Lee wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Subject: T !r (a -n*n =l&e ` S !e .x|
Subject: Se^x M-o ^v ~l e -
More chickenpoxed subjects.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaho
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Mynabbler wrote:
Typically the chickenpox rules do not get a lot of love abroad, since they
tend to trip over other languages than English. However, does someone have
an idea how to use the logic in chickenpox for subjects like these:
... or does someone have a decent rule
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
address to some other account that is not mine.
First off I'm p...@topguncomputers.com. I also run the postfix servers.
Usually my spam score is about 1
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Instead of doing greylisting, I started doing SA+Greylisting 3 months ago.
Since then, this guy always gets through until I modify our custom ruleset to
block his URLs.
Currently I have:
uri OUR_CUSTOM_URI /\.(tumblr\.com|de\.tl|filea
You should be able to just load it up in a current version of SA and see if
it throws any errors.
There's nothing that pops out at me as more problematic for the current
version than an old version, but
On 10/15, Harry Putnam wrote:
> trusted_networks 192.168.0.
I don't think that was ever n
I found a version of local.cf from a good while back. About a year
and just wanted to see if anyone sees something in it that would be
incompatible or just wrong for current versions of SA.
Its a bit much to ask since its still 96 lines even with all comments
and blank lines removed. But still i
14 matches
Mail list logo
