On 7 Oct 2011 00:28:49 -
"John Levine" wrote:
> >Does anyone blacklist based on SPF?
> Nobody with any interest in delivering the mail that their users want.
> The error rate is much, much too high.
It depends. I very confidently blacklist mail from "roaringpenguin.com"
that fails to pass
In article
you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I've noticed some trojans with addresses from usps.com slip through.
>
>Does anyone blacklist based on SPF?
Nobody with any interest in delivering the mail that their users want.
The error rate is much, much too high.
R's,
John
On 2011-10-06 12:09, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Axb wrote:
On 2011-10-06 11:42, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
On 05/10/11 12:49, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:59:59PM -0400, Alex B. wrote:
On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi there,
I have to set-up a few low power
On 2011-10-06 11:42, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
On 05/10/11 12:49, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:59:59PM -0400, Alex B. wrote:
On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi there,
I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to
using Intel Xeon
On 05/10/11 12:49, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:59:59PM -0400, Alex B. wrote:
On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi there,
I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to
using Intel Xe
