On 09/28, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 09/28, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > You would only have to test the rule combinations that the message
> > actually triggered. So if it hit 10 rules then it would be 1024
> > combinations. Seems not to be unreasonable to me.
> combinations in the actual corpo
On 09/28, Marc Perkel wrote:
> You would only have to test the rule combinations that the message
> actually triggered. So if it hit 10 rules then it would be 1024
> combinations. Seems not to be unreasonable to me.
You definitely have a good point that it would only be necessary to track
the comb
On 9/27/2011 9:25 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 09/27, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's the kind of think I'm seeing. Spam talks about money - low
score. Spam talks about Jesus - low score. Spam talks about money
and Jesus and throw in a dear someone and it's spam. I'm hoping to
detect combina
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:30:32 +0200
Lars Jørgensen wrote:
> Looking at
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning_options
>
> i see an option called "bayes_use_hapaxes" that promises
> significantly better hit-rates, but also increases database size by a
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:30:32 +0200, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
On 28-09-2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I train Bayes manually on the borderline cases, but also have
auto-learning enabled. Is that really a bad idea? Should I disable
it,
delete the bayes-databases and start over on manual-only lea
On 28-09-2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I train Bayes manually on the borderline cases, but also have
auto-learning enabled. Is that really a bad idea? Should I disable it,
delete the bayes-databases and start over on manual-only learning?
no training is always good
Are you missing a comma
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:07:55 +0200, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct forum, but google couldn't help me
(or I am too low on caffeine).
I get a lot of spam that would have been flagged as such, but a bayes
score of -1.9 pulls it down to hammy status.
I train Bayes manua
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct forum, but google couldn't help me (or I
am too low on caffeine).
I get a lot of spam that would have been flagged as such, but a bayes
score of -1.9 pulls it down to hammy status.
I train Bayes manually on the borderline cases, but also have
auto-learni
