On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
> It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my inbox
> is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research in my
> inbox and it turns out to be right on the money. All stuff that I
> didn't want.
I'm very curious what exactly your stat
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
> > It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my
> > inbox is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research
> > in my inbox and it turns out to
On 26/09/11 19:00, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my
inbox is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research
in my inbox and it turns
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
> > It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my
> > inbox is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research
> > in my inbox and it turns out to be right on the money.
On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
> It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my inbox
> is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research in my
> inbox and it turns out to be right on the money. All stuff that I
> didn't want.
Disclaimer: I'm a dnswl.org admin, alt
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:24:36 +, Londen, Michael van wrote:
P PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS MESSAGE.
save trees dont post html :)
send a email to users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org reply to what
you get back, and then you are off the list
W dniu 26.09.2011 15:53, Bowie Bailey pisze:
There is nothing in that sample that would cause the rule to fire. I
downloaded it and ran it against my SA and did not get a match for
MISSING_SUBJECT. The only thing I can think of is that the headers end
at the first blank line. If there is a bla
W dniu 26.09.2011 15:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
I don't see other X-Spam headers there. How are you running
spamassassin? Aren't you using amavis ot other software using just
spamassassin libraries?
Are you sure some 3rd party does not modify mail headers?
No, i don't use any 3rd packag
On 9/26/2011 9:37 AM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> Hello!
> I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email from
> thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores email. Here
> is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with little mungled
> recipient).
> Rules a
On 26.09.11 15:37, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email
from thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores
email. Here is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with
little mungled recipient).
Rules are in version: 11620
Hello!
I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email from
thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores email. Here
is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with little mungled
recipient).
Rules are in version: 1162027, spamassassin-3.3.2
Thanks for h
Met vriendelijke groet,
[Beschrijving:
C:\Users\admin_mlonde01\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Handtekeningen\akn.gif]
Michael van Londen
informatie & media technologie
netwerkbeheerder
T:
+31356714900 (Extern)/1234 Optie 2 (Intern)
F:
+31356714538
E:
michael.vanlon...@akn.nl
W: http://www.akn
Hello,
I was trying to write a rule that would lower the effect of FRT_PENIS1
rule, since this one often matches text in czech/slovak language
(e.g. peníze == money)
I didn't want to zero score of FRT_PENIS1, because that still may catch
some spam.
I have expected that putting UTF-8 text into
13 matches
Mail list logo