On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:57:42 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> iiuc, the msa_networks was created to explicitly tell SA that mail
> was authenticated.
When something relays through a server in msa_networks, anything before
that inherits its trusted/internal network status. This pr
due to many spam problems (outbreaks) in history, we check for
spamminess on outgoing mail servers.
However there are rules that should not apply on them.
- Dynamic/blacklist (except URIBL) checks
I can avoid these by defining local server to msa_networks
- ALL_TRUSTED
I'm sure I have to turn
On 09.09.11 17:20, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
due to many spam problems (outbreaks) in history, we check for
spamminess on outgoing mail servers.
However there are rules that should not apply on them.
- Dynamic/blacklist (except URIBL) checks
I can avoid these by defining local server to ms
Hello,
iiuc, the msa_networks was created to explicitly tell SA that mail was
authenticated.
Is there a locical difference betwen mail authenticated by MSA in
msa_networks and mail authenticated locally, or by internal relay?
I mean, do we trust host in msa_networks more than host that
aut
