On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:23:11 +0200, J4K wrote:
body __PP1/(New Release Update)/i
uri __PP2 /(\.com|\.com)/i
meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1 && __PR2)
__pp.. not __pr..
On 09/01/2011 04:33 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
> Le 01/09/2011 16:23, J4K a écrit :
>> meta PRIVATE_RULE1 (__PR1&& __PR2)
> ...
>> meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1&& __PR2)
>>
>> Spamassassin -D -lint records this:
>> Sep 1 15:45:56.313 [11484] dbg: rules: PRIVATE_PHONICA2 merged
>> duplicates:
Le 01/09/2011 16:23, J4K a écrit :
meta PRIVATE_RULE1 (__PR1&& __PR2)
...
meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1&& __PR2)
Spamassassin -D -lint records this:
Sep 1 15:45:56.313 [11484] dbg: rules: PRIVATE_PHONICA2 merged
duplicates: PRIVATE_RULE1
What is this really telling me, and why is th
On 9/1/2011 10:23 AM, J4K wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got these two rules in the local.cf.
>
> describe PRIVATE_RULE1 English language job opportunity
> body __PR1/(Employment opportunity|Job offer match, respond
> to apply|Employment you've been searching|Job opportunity|Career
>
Hi there,
I've got these two rules in the local.cf.
describe PRIVATE_RULE1 English language job opportunity
body __PR1/(Employment opportunity|Job offer match, respond
to apply|Employment you've been searching|Job opportunity|Career
opportunity inside|Position opening in your are