On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
(I hear the publishing mechanism now allows for scores set in the
sandboxes to act as upper limits on published rules. That would solve
this issue.)
Confirmed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Jeff Mincy wrote:
Can somebody clue me in on how to match 'Disposition:
automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; deleted'
in a disposition-notification mime attachment?
--_=_NextPart_001_01CC55E0.440F392C
Content-Type: message/disposition-notification
Content-Tran
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:49:36 -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
>> I fixed this yesterday and updates are now fully functional.
On 08/05/2011 07:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> super, i just noticed nopublis in the above file, is this intended ?
Short answer: Yes. The GA is too slow to publish them itself.
Can somebody clue me in on how to match 'Disposition:
automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; deleted'
in a disposition-notification mime attachment?
--_=_NextPart_001_01CC55E0.440F392C
Content-Type: message/disposition-notification
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Final-Recipi
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:00:20 +0200
Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> Good morning list.
>
> I have a client complaining that his mails are being tagged
> incorrectly.
>
> I have included a link to the message: http://pastebin.com/Y69VUMym
>
> It would appear that he is correct.
>
> This is a black test me
On 8/8/11 6:30 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 08/08/2011 12:23, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 8/8/11 4:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Well spotted.
I missed that.
it was 4am :-)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Sol
On 08/08/2011 12:23, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 8/8/11 4:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Well spotted.
I missed that.
Apologies & thanks
On 8/8/11 4:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good morning list.
I have a client complaining that his mails are being tagged incorrectly.
no, they are being tagged correctly.
I have included a link to the message: http://pastebin.com/Y69VUMym
It would appear that he is correct.
This is a BLANK t
Good morning list.
I have a client complaining that his mails are being tagged incorrectly.
I have included a link to the message: http://pastebin.com/Y69VUMym
It would appear that he is correct.
This is a BLANK test message with 2 jpeg images.
however, it hits the rules:
FILL_THIS_FORM & F
Good morning list.
I have a client complaining that his mails are being tagged incorrectly.
I have included a link to the message: http://pastebin.com/Y69VUMym
It would appear that he is correct.
This is a black test message with 2 jpeg images.
however, it hits the rules:
FILL_THIS_FORM & FI
10 matches
Mail list logo
