On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:45 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:41:34 -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> > 72_active.cf:header FS_REPLICA Subject =~ /replica/i
>
> > anyone else think that ANY rule that scores above a 3 is asking for
> > trouble?
>
> Yikes!
>
> I
On 07/21, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> but, this rule seems to be way too aggressive.
>
> 50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICA 1.630 3.599 2.028 3.599 # n=2
> 50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICAWATCH 3.237 1.715 1.733 3.015 # n=2
> 72_active.cf:header FS_REPLICA Subject =~ /replica/i
> 72_active.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:41:34 -0400
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> 72_active.cf:header FS_REPLICA Subject =~ /replica/i
> anyone else think that ANY rule that scores above a 3 is asking for
> trouble?
Yikes!
I think any rule that looks like Subject =~ /string/i is asking for
trouble.
yes, I hate those silly knock off spams.
but, this rule seems to be way too aggressive.
50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICA 1.630 3.599 2.028 3.599 # n=2
50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICAWATCH 3.237 1.715 1.733 3.015 # n=2
72_active.cf:##{ FS_REPLICA
72_active.cf:header FS_REPLICA Subject =~
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/20, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Can someone suggest some better OCR plugin for Spamassassin 3.3.1 for image
spam?
It still seems strange to me that anybody has ever bothered with using OCR
to deal with image spam, when it's so easy, and for me not problematic, to
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:47:00 +0100
> "Sharma, Ashish" wrote:
>
>> Can you please outline the other techniques that you use to catch
>> image spams?
>
> We find Bayes (we have our own implementation) and RBLs (again, we have
> our own) work pretty well.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
Shane,
Thanks Mark,
We are using Amavisd to call SpamAssassin. Cacti looks great, we hope to
implement Cacti soon.
Thanks for the info, and many thanks for Amavisd.
Btw, for more info search the release notes (the feature was introduced
in 2.6.4) for the following text:
- newly supplied wit
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:47:00 +0100
"Sharma, Ashish" wrote:
> Can you please outline the other techniques that you use to catch
> image spams?
We find Bayes (we have our own implementation) and RBLs (again, we have
our own) work pretty well.
Regards,
David.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UnmaintainedCustomPlugins
"OCR scanner and image validator SA-plugin"
"OCR Plugin"
may be worth a try.. no idea how well they work
The Spamassassin wiki is so cool
On 2011-07-21 8:53, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
All,
The current functionality requires me to
