"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:26:16 +0200
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> Would you recommend redesigning (mainly) DUL/DUL+ DNSBL lists to
>> improve DNS cache hit ratio?
>
> No, not really. The poor cache hit ratio doesn't seem to be a problem
> in practice (most people were
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 00:53 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:38:46 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > And the SA users list shouldn't have been included in the first place,
> > don't you think?
>
> first off all, welcome back Karsten :)
Heh, thanks. :) Never been off t
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:26:16 +0200
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Would you recommend redesigning (mainly) DUL/DUL+ DNSBL lists to
> improve DNS cache hit ratio?
No, not really. The poor cache hit ratio doesn't seem to be a problem
in practice (most people were surprised by the results). If you h
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:38:46 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
And the SA users list shouldn't have been included in the first
place,
don't you think?
first off all, welcome back Karsten :)
yes i think that some users have turned spamassassin into a virus
scanner with clamav plugin, and vis
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:15 +0200, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> in my station
> anti virus EICAR file is not detected by the couple clamd amavisd
^^
>
> all testimonials are welcome
Oh, sure... Naughty boy. Bad cross-posting.
And
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:52:00 +0200
> Axb wrote:
>
>> BLs generally adjust their negative TTL to get a practical balance
>> between query load and positive hits.
>> Gaming these settings can become a costly process.
>
> My experiments on real mail servers show that DNS c
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:52:00 +0200
> Axb wrote:
>
>> BLs generally adjust their negative TTL to get a practical balance
>> between query load and positive hits.
>> Gaming these settings can become a costly process.
>
> My experiments on real mail servers show that DNS c
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:20:18 +0200
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > My experiments on real mail servers show that DNS caching is quite
> > ineffective for DNSBLs (at least for typical ones like Spamhaus that
> > use a short TTL on the order of 15-30 minutes.)
> Is the TTL set global or are the TTLs se
On 7/5/11 3:15 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
in my station
anti virus EICAR file is not detected by the couple clamd amavisd
all testimonials are welcome
works fine here. you must be doing something wrong.
find out what you are doing wrong and it will work.
--
Michael Scheidell
hi folks
in my station
anti virus EICAR file is not detected by the couple clamd amavisd
all testimonials are welcome
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
pgpiBHw6zHTrd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 4, 2011, 3:46:15 AM, Warren Jr. wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>
>>
http://www.spamtips.org/2011/07/spamassassin-why-run-your-own-dns.html
>> I wrote this article about why it can be important to run your own
>> DNS server if you have a busy Spamassassin deployment.
>
>>
On 7/1/11 10:28 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
Sounds good.
I will disable the JIT bytecode engine in 0.97.1 with the next daily.cvd update
(0.97, 0.96.x and master will not be affected).
0.97.1 should then fall back to interpreter, so that others who don't have the
patch applied don't get their clamd
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:29:21 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Return-Path:
could add this domain as freemail_domains
left handside before @ can be a freemail sender
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=4.5
tests=BAYES_20,MISSING_MID,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 12:20 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2011-07-04 09:24:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > My experiments on real mail servers show that DNS caching is quite
> > ineffective for DNSBLs (at least for typical ones like Spamhaus that
> > use a short TTL on the order of 15
Hello David F. Skoll,
Am 2011-07-04 09:24:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> My experiments on real mail servers show that DNS caching is quite
> ineffective for DNSBLs (at least for typical ones like Spamhaus that
> use a short TTL on the order of 15-30 minutes.)
Is the TTL set global or are
Hello Martin Gregorie,
Am 2011-07-05 10:29:25, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Is this a legitimate google group, i.e. one that wasn't set up as a spam
> target?
It doen not seeem to be...
> I ask because the genuine Google Groups I've seen have either
> USENET type names or (at least) human-c
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
snippage
> mitra.hesab8042...@yahoo.com has invited you to join the deividfincher77364
> group with this message:
>
Is this a legitimate google group, i.e. one that wasn't set up as a spam
target? I ask because the genuine Goo
Hi,
On Tue, 05.07.2011 at 07:18:30 +, Jason Ede
wrote:
> Andreas Schulze [mailto:s...@andreasschulze.de] wrote:
> > - bind (off course)
although I'm sure that it was meant in a different way, "off course"
hits the nail right onto the head, imnsho.
> Are there any figures on the relative
Hello Benny Pedersen,
Am 2011-07-04 15:53:33, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:50:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >>reject yahoo.com senders that are NOT dkim signed
> >The message has a From: from GoogleGroups... and in the E-Mail
> >is the
> >E-Mail of the Group-Owne
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Schulze [mailto:s...@andreasschulze.de]
> Sent: 04 July 2011 12:11
> To: Warren Togami Jr.
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SpamTips.org: Why run your own DNS server?
>
> Warren,
>
> > Anyone have any better tips of an alternate DNS r
20 matches
Mail list logo
