On 29/06/2011 19:28, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
A proper From header would be:
From: lawrencewilli...@nl.rogers.com
or
From: "Lawrence Williams" lawrencewilli...@nl.rogers.com
This is most likely a bug in the e-mail system you are using.
Regards,
Lawrence
Thank you to everyone who has respond
On Wednesday June 29 2011 21:59:52 Yves Goergen wrote:
> On 29.06.2011 21:03 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote:
> > Could somebody please just send me a message from an IPv6
> > mail server to my address? (Preferably from a host that should not be
> > caught by Botnet...)
> [...]
> Doesn't seem to work. I
On 29.06.2011 21:03 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote:
> Could somebody please just send me a message from an IPv6
> mail server to my address? (Preferably from a host that should not be
> caught by Botnet...)
Here's a mail I just received: (thank you to the sender)
> Received: from sp***ck.di***ie.com
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM bayes_vars
This will give a list of usernames that have been used to learn ham and
spam into SpamAssassin's Bayes MySQL DB. For a site-wide installation,
this s
On 06/29/2011 09:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, JKL wrote:
>
>> mysql> select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars;
>> +---+
>> | count(spam_count) |
>> +---+
>> | 185 |
>> +---+
>>
>> mysql> select count(ham_count) from b
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, JKL wrote:
mysql> select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars;
+---+
| count(spam_count) |
+---+
| 185 |
+---+
mysql> select count(ham_count) from bayes_vars;
+--+
| count(ham_count) |
+-
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Just checked and am now unsure whether it is enables or not:
oot@logout:/etc/spamassassin# grep -i bay local.cf Use Bayesian classifier
(default: 1)
ayes_auto_learn 1
I suggest you disable auto-learn until you have a good manually collected
an
On 06/29/2011 08:50 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> On 29/06/2011 3:59 PM, JKL wrote:
>> On 06/29/2011 04:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, J4K wrote:
>>>
Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New
Employment
Today | Career Opportunity' style email.
On 13.06.2011 13:51 CE(S)T, Matthew Newton wrote:
>> Can you post the patched Botnet.pm and Botnet.cf, that would be cool.
>
> I've put the patched Botnet.pm here:
>
> http://www.le.ac.uk/users/mcn4/botnet/
Hi,
I was looking for an IPv6 fix for Botnet before but nobody (including
me) was able t
On 29/06/2011 3:59 PM, JKL wrote:
On 06/29/2011 04:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, J4K wrote:
Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New Employment
Today | Career Opportunity' style email. The rules I use, that are
pretty much stock rules, correctly tag the ema
On 06/29/2011 04:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, J4K wrote:
>
>> Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New Employment
>> Today | Career Opportunity' style email. The rules I use, that are
>> pretty much stock rules, correctly tag the email as spam. Usually the
>>
On 29/06/2011 8:37 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good afternoon list.
is there a way to exclude a domain from the fremail_domain checks in
the local.cf?
I do not want to have to manually remove our domain (which does not
offer freemail) from the 20_freemail_domains.cf file every time we
update.
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:32:12 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
In any case I think it is valid to open up a bug so we can implement
the
"unlisting" config feature for FreeMail plugin.
freemail_whielist ?
what about freemail_whitelist_auth ?
i do read source :=)
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:34:16 +0200, Axb wrote:
On 2011-06-29 13:07, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good afternoon list.
is there a way to exclude a domain from the fremail_domain checks in
the
local.cf?
I do not want to have to manually remove our domain (which does not
offer freemail) from the 20_free
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:27:58 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 29/06/2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07:24 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
our own mail is matching:
FROM_MISSP_FREEMAIL
so fix the mua, none have asked to use brokken email clients
I do not have access to the
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, J4K wrote:
Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New Employment
Today | Career Opportunity' style email. The rules I use, that are
pretty much stock rules, correctly tag the email as spam. Usually the
Spam score hovers between 5.5 and 6.9.
Is there some
Dear all,
Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New Employment
Today | Career Opportunity' style email. The rules I use, that are
pretty much stock rules, correctly tag the email as spam. Usually the
Spam score hovers between 5.5 and 6.9.
I would like to add a rule that adds mo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:54:26PM +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> On 29/06/2011 14:50, John Hardin wrote:
> >and the rules are hit
> the domain which our clients use is vodamail.co.za
>
> So the outbound servers, which use SpamAssassin, are hitting the
> rule mentioned.
>
> As such, a lot of our cl
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 29/06/2011 14:50, John Hardin wrote:
and the rules are hit
the domain which our clients use is vodamail.co.za
Is that your domain also?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #1
On 29/06/2011 14:50, John Hardin wrote:
and the rules are hit
the domain which our clients use is vodamail.co.za
So the outbound servers, which use SpamAssassin, are hitting the rule
mentioned.
As such, a lot of our clients outbound mail are being rejected.
It is a GSM network and a lot of m
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
I do not want to have to manually remove our domain (which does not offer
freemail) from the 20_freemail_domains.cf file every time we update.
refer to bug 6542
Is your domain vodamail.co.za or are you just offering that bug as an
example of the clas
On 29/06/11 12:50, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Hi List,
I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External
On 29/06/2011 13:34, Axb wrote:
afaik you can't disable a domain atm but you could use a rule doing
something like (untested):
header NICE_ENVFROM_YOURDOMAIN
eval:check_freemail_header('EnvelopeFrom', '\@YOUR_DOMAIN')
describe NICE__ENVFROM_YOURDOMAIN Envelope-from YOUR_DOMAIN
score NICE__ENV
On 28/06/2011 11:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Now I'm seeing these error messages in the logs:
>
> Issuing rollback() due to DESTROY without explicit disconnect() of
> DBD::mysql::db handle
>
> I'm beginning to wonder if MySQL bays actually works. I'm just geeing
> too many strange errors.
Which
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
> > really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External
> > header as DNSBL
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:01:54 +0100
Ned Slider wrote:
>
> Yes, _LASTEXTERNALRDNS_ would certainly work as the connecting IP has
> rDNS that matches the string I was trying to match.
>
> Where might I find examples of TEMPLATE TAGS usage? It's unclear to
> me how to use these options so some exa
On 2011-06-29 13:07, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good afternoon list.
is there a way to exclude a domain from the fremail_domain checks in the
local.cf?
I do not want to have to manually remove our domain (which does not
offer freemail) from the 20_freemail_domains.cf file every time we update.
refer
On 29/06/2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07:24 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
our own mail is matching:
FROM_MISSP_FREEMAIL
so fix the mua, none have asked to use brokken email clients
I do not have access to the clients mua...
and this was not what I asked.
Please kee
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07:24 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
our own mail is matching:
FROM_MISSP_FREEMAIL
so fix the mua, none have asked to use brokken email clients
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:58 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Who said anything about trusting the IP ?
I simply want to verify that the email was relayed to me from a
particular ISP as part of a meta rule. The very fact that the
hostname(s) do have many IPs is the reason for matching that rather
than
Good afternoon list.
is there a way to exclude a domain from the fremail_domain checks in the
local.cf?
I do not want to have to manually remove our domain (which does not
offer freemail) from the 20_freemail_domains.cf file every time we update.
refer to bug 6542
http://old.nabble.com/-Bu
On 29/06/11 11:24, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:02:13 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
header __RCVD_FROM_SOMEISP X-Spam-Relays-Last-External =~ /someisp\.com/i
bad rule, hostnames can have more then one ip, would you trust every ip
now ?
Who said anything about trusting the IP ?
On 29/06/11 11:12, Axb wrote:
On 2011-06-29 12:02, Ned Slider wrote:
Hi List,
I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header
as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal.
Is there a X-Spam-Relays-L
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
> really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External
> header as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal.
>
> Is there a X-Spam-Relays
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:02:13 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
header __RCVD_FROM_SOMEISP X-Spam-Relays-Last-External =~
/someisp\.com/i
bad rule, hostnames can have more then one ip, would you trust every ip
now ?
better would be to extend ASN plugin to have whitelist specific ASN or
blacklist
On 2011-06-29 12:02, Ned Slider wrote:
Hi List,
I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header
as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal.
Is there a X-Spam-Relays-Last-External option that I'm mi
Hi List,
I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd
really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header
as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal.
Is there a X-Spam-Relays-Last-External option that I'm missing, and if
not would it be possib
37 matches
Mail list logo
