--On Friday, June 17, 2011 13:52 +0100 RW
wrote:
2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
section. Some email client will display such attachments.
That, and a SpamAssassin bug/feature, that it scans on
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 0:58 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
make a info tdl rule with a score of 2.5,
Meta: From has .info AND uri has .info, score 2.0. We've done it for
years. Works fine. Maybe it could be 2.5.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:20:43 +
Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
>
> 2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
section. Some email client will display s
Hi,
My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
2.8 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different freemails
I am unable to get a suitable explanation for these rules.
Please help
Thanks
Ashish
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:41:28 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
Hello,
I just read that SARE shouldn't be used anymore[1] (note maintained
anymore, and many false-positives reported) Is that true? If so,
which list can you suggest? For now, I don't have any problem with
FPs,
