On 6/14/2011 12:10 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
Marc,
You can also find the readme for sql support there, or check out:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.3/sql/README.bayes
It's quite easy to setup and get running.
I can't seem to find the bayes_mysql.sql file anywhere.
So, reading some history, I can see that a few years back, Bayes was made a
plugin to allow it to be replaced, according to bug 5293. Apparently, this
is in Spamassassin 3.3.1 as I found it in the code.
I might want to do just that. So, here's what I would like: Internal Bayes
would be off, my Ba
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:40:33 -0400, Morgan Bishop wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.3/sql/bayes_mysql.sql
note that MyISAM should be changed to INNODB on bayes_token if you have
INNODB avail, other tables can still be as is
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:32 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Not sure I understand the question.
The DKIM_ADSP_ALL rule as distributed does test for a valid
author domain signature and does not fire in its presence:
header DKIM_ADSP_ALL eval:check_dkim_adsp('A')
olso what i see, amavisd only m
Marc,
You can also find the readme for sql support there, or check out:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.3/sql/README.bayes
It's quite easy to setup and get running.
I can't seem to find the bayes_mysql.sql file anywhere.
Depending on your distribution it could be in
Please keep the thread on-list, unless you specifically intend to
contact me personally. Others can help you, too.
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:20 +0200, Sebastian Deißner wrote:
> Am 14.06.2011 16:44, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > Seems the problem is your DNS configuration. The DNS on the RBL ser
On 6/14/2011 10:40 AM, Morgan Bishop wrote:
On 6/14/2011 1:23 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 6/14/2011 10:19 AM, Morgan Bishop wrote:
On 6/14/2011 1:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions
for creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
Tha
On 6/14/2011 1:23 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 6/14/2011 10:19 AM, Morgan Bishop wrote:
On 6/14/2011 1:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions for
creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
Thanks in advance
I'm not sure, but I believe you
On 6/14/2011 10:19 AM, Morgan Bishop wrote:
On 6/14/2011 1:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions for
creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
Thanks in advance
I'm not sure, but I believe you are looking for bayes_mysql.sql in the
s
On 6/14/2011 1:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions for
creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
Thanks in advance
I'm not sure, but I believe you are looking for bayes_mysql.sql in the
spamassassin documentation directory. Depending
Look in the "sql" directory in the source code,
Andy.
Quoting Marc Perkel :
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions for
creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
I must be blind but I can seem to find the files or instructions for
creating the mysql databases to set up bayes.
Thanks in advance
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 21:07 +0200, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> - the answer is the ip of the rbl-server.
>
> i think that is not correct?
Nope, that most likely is not correct. You tell us, though -- isn't that
your domain, and your own, local RBL?
> # dig 18.151.139.61.rbl.cdubitterfeld.de
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:58 -0400, pseudonymous Alex wrote:
> I see that recently Justin made some changes to the svn rules for
> this, but I wasn't sure if that was going to be reflected in the
> channel?
Yes, it will eventually. See the other direct reply by Justin from Sat
to the post you repli
Hi,
>> Wait a sec, I'm confused about this. "JM_SOUGHT_2 hitting on every
>> legit Facebook message" on dev@ list February 17th 2011. If the SOUGHT
>> channel was being overridden by the sa-update rules, how would this
>> problem appear from the SOUGHT channel? Doesn't this suggest that
>> spam
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:56 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 8:01 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > IFF you use the sought channel with SA 3.3.x, you will need the reorder
> > hack to bend the alphabet.
>
> Would it be worthwhile to change the main code instead? Rather than
> making a
Benny,
> missing meta on DKIM_VALID when DKIM_ADSP_ALL ?
> header testing ___DKIM_ADSP_ALL eval:test()
> meta DKIM_ADSP_ALL (__DKIM_ADSP_ALL && !DKIM_VALID)
> or is it just checking with DKIM_VALID_AU ?
> how to solve it ?
Not sure I understand the question.
The DKIM_ADSP_ALL rule as distrib
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:52:25PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:29:23 +0200, Alessandro Dentella wrote:
>
> >thanks to all of you for the great support.
>
> super duper will test this in postfix, just a shame one need to turn
> postfix into a content filter just to make i
18 matches
Mail list logo
