> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > You still did not explain us how do you connect postfix with spamassassin.
> > There are many ways to do this, but you have only denied all possible ways
> > we mentioned but you didn't provide the way you use.
On 06.06.11 09:01, asimhafeez wrote:
> Here is how
Just re-iterate spamassassin in any form will do nothing other than
yag the email. It's another programs job to do this. Personally I'd
recommend a mailscanner based solution to this problem
On Monday, 6 June 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wro
We need +3 votes from PMC (or the release manager) to declare 3.3.2 an
official ASF release. This 3.3.2 release has no changes since
3.3.2-rc2. Please do some testing before voting.
If you are not a PMC member, please let us know if you see any
regressions since 3.3.1 along with details of y
I'm new to all of this and I'm not sure if training with sa-learn is
having any effect as this SPAM still scores the same and bayes thinks
it's probably less than 1% SPAM (BAYES_00). I'm run a small vanity
domain for friends and family so there isn't exactly a ton of training
going on, but I'm
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
>>> Postfix with SpamAssassin not any milter amavis or mailscanner.
>> main.cf:
>> ...
>> header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/pcre.header_checks
>> pcre.header_checks:
>> ...
>> # Discard Spam over 15.
>> /^X-Spam-Level: \*{15,}/ DISC
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 06.06.11 08:31, asimhafeez wrote:
>> My scenario is as following.
>>
>> Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
>> "LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains,
>> directly
>> connected over ethernet with spam-filter
On 06.06.11 08:31, asimhafeez wrote:
> My scenario is as following.
>
> Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
> "LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains, directly
> connected over ethernet with spam-filtering machine]
you really don't need to repeat
asimhafeez wrote:
>
>
> Duane Hill-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hello asimhafeez,
>>
>> Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>
> > wrote:
> >> Is there any possibility
Duane Hill-2 wrote:
>
> Hello asimhafeez,
>
> Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wrote:
>> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking
(
> >> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> >> In the above scenario I tried using postfix with spamassassin
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > postfix with spamassassin how?
> > This is the important question.
> > Milter? amavis? mailscanner?
On 06.06.11 08:10, asimhafeez wrot
Hello asimhafeez,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>>> >> the
>>> >> emails as [SPAM] in su
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>> >> the
>> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
>> >> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine a
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> > wrote:
> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
> >> the
> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> >> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want
> >> to
> >> filter the spam in a s
13 matches
Mail list logo