OT: Haraka - plugin capable SMTP server

2011-06-03 Thread Yet Another Ninja
for those looking for new tools for their arsenal.. take a look at the relatively new Haraka. running it as a proxy, I'm impressed. enjoy! https://github.com/baudehlo/Haraka Haraka - a Node.js Mail Server Haraka is a plugin capable SMTP server. It uses a highly scalable event model to be abl

Re: Why does this score so high?

2011-06-03 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 03/06/2011 13:50, RW wrote: #spamd -V SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4 This is much more out-of-date that the version numbers would suggest. The rules for this release haven't been under active development since 2008. OUCHguess that's what you get when you inherit a system. I will

Re: Why does this score so high?

2011-06-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:27:17 +0200 Tom Kinghorn wrote: > On 03/06/2011 13:15, RW wrote: > >> why does this score so highly? > > > > Probably your rules are out of date, it scores zero in mine. I don't > > know the details, but I imagine it was thought to be a separator > > format added only by sp

Re: Why does this score so high?

2011-06-03 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 03/06/2011 13:15, RW wrote: why does this score so highly? Probably your rules are out of date, it scores zero in mine. I don't know the details, but I imagine it was thought to be a separator format added only by spamming software. Thanks for the response. The version is a little behind

Re: Why does this score so high?

2011-06-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:10:50 +0200 Tom Kinghorn wrote: > Hi Guys > > We have a client who's mail is hitting the rule "MIME_BOUND_EQ_REL" > > It contains the lines > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/related; > type="multipart/alternative"; > boundary="

Why does this score so high?

2011-06-03 Thread Tom Kinghorn
Hi Guys We have a client who's mail is hitting the rule "MIME_BOUND_EQ_REL" It contains the lines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="=_18911281==.REL" why does this score so highly? Apologies for the