Thanks for your responses.
Sorry, forgot temporarily, that SA only classifies spam and other
mechanism's control what is done to it after that. Therefore the issue lies
elsewhere as you rightly say.
It seems that if the sender is <> Exim always delivers it to the inbox,
regardless of the how it
On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT), leonardevens
wrote:
> But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
> which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all
the
> messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I
prceed
> to li
On Thu, 12 May 2011, leonardevens wrote:
But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all the
messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I prceed
to limit such spam without disrup
On Thu, 12 May 2011, leonardevens wrote:
But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all
the messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I
prceed to limit such spam without disrup
On 05/12, leonardevens wrote:
> But recently I got email posted from a yahoo group which I subscribe to
> which contained spam. If I classify those messages as spam, will all the
> messages from that gorup also be classified as spam? How should I prceed
> to limit such spam without disrupting l
I am using spamassassin on a email server running Scientific Linux.
I download my email to my local machine which is running Fedora 14 Linux,
using evolution. The spam detections is done on the server, on which I
keep one file to collect messages I want to be recognized as spam and
another to
Hello Ted,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 5:06:15 PM, you wrote:
TM> I mentioned that this was with greylist-milter, you are merely
TM> shifting your claim now to essentially blaming greylist-milter for
TM> not issuing a standard SMTP error 4xx.
No you didn't, and no I am not casting any aspersions on
On 5/12/2011 4:49 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Matus,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 12:11:10 PM, you wrote:
MUf> Actyally, Michael Scheidell reported that yahoo miebehaves when receiving
MUf> 4xx response after RCPT TO:
Very different from the original blanket claim that "Yahoo's SMTP mailers a
On Thu, 12 May 2011 16:00:38 +0200
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Which RFC? Limiting the "recipients per envelope" is legitim.
Limiting it to 1 is pushing it. RFC 5321 says:
"The minimum total number of recipients that MUST be buffered is 100
recipients. Rejection of messages (for excessi
Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Am 2011-05-12 09:06:10, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On 11.05.11 19:30, Joe Sniderman wrote:
> > We do something similar, except that the maximum number of recipients
> > per envelope we set at 1. The second and all subsequent get a 4yz error
> > during RCPT. We
Hello dar...@chaosreigns.com,
Am 2011-05-11 16:01:38, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/dnswlabusehistory.svg
>
> Percentage of total spam from legitimate email providers in April as
> reported as abuse to dnswl.org:
>
> 35.5% yahoo.com
Configuration option in /
Hello Matus,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 12:11:10 PM, you wrote:
MUf> Actyally, Michael Scheidell reported that yahoo miebehaves when receiving
MUf> 4xx response after RCPT TO:
Very different from the original blanket claim that "Yahoo's SMTP mailers are
unable to handle a standard SMTP error 4xx,
Hello Ted,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 9:54:56 AM, you wrote:
TM> I investigated and did not see retries from
TM> Yahoo's mailservers in the mail log file
Funnily enough I do see retries-
2009-10-03 02:01:32.887 tcpserver: ok 24589
mail.redbus.holtain.net:217.146.107.39:25
n10.bullet.mail.mud.ya
>> Thursday, May 12, 2011, 7:36:01 AM, you wrote:
>> TM> Your welcome to my exclusion list if you want it, I'm not
>> TM> going to post it here but anyone who wants a copy can just ask.
>> TM> Do you want a copy?
> On 5/12/2011 12:08 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>> Of your exclusion list no, but I
On 5/12/2011 12:08 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Ted,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 7:36:01 AM, you wrote:
TM> Your welcome to my exclusion list if you want it, I'm not
TM> going to post it here but anyone who wants a copy can just ask.
TM> Do you want a copy?
Of your exclusion list no, but I a
Hello Ted,
Thursday, May 12, 2011, 7:36:01 AM, you wrote:
TM> Your welcome to my exclusion list if you want it, I'm not
TM> going to post it here but anyone who wants a copy can just ask.
TM> Do you want a copy?
Of your exclusion list no, but I am asking you to post the evidence
backing up your
> On 05/11/2011 04:35 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > if someone sends an email to 175 people, once they hit 'x' number in the
> > first email attempt, we send '4xx too many emails'
>
> > ie:
> > ehlo *.yahoo.com
> > mail from:
> > rcpt to:
> > 250 ok
> > rcpt to:
> > 250 ok
> > [skip to 100].
17 matches
Mail list logo
