Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-07 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 21:32:38 -0700 (PDT), John Hardin wrote: The best way is to tell whatever calls SA that mail from that IP address shouldn't be given to SA at all. remember this olso disable bayes ham learning It only disables _automatic_ bayes

Re: Creating new rules

2011-05-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
All the emails have a common pattern (HTML_LINK + JUNK_TEXT): meta on info tld && !user_in_whitelist_from_spf train bayes, adjust autolearnthreshold to less then default -0.2 why have none devs maked a policyd that make sure sender is known to the recipient ?, (i got a new email address blocki

Re: Creating new rules

2011-05-07 Thread Ned Slider
On 07/05/11 19:38, Andrea Gozzi wrote: Hi guys. I need some help in setting up effective rules to counter a spam wave that has been hitting my server lately. Most of the messages come from hotmail.com accounts and for obvious reasons I can't block the whole domain. All the emails have a common pa

Creating new rules

2011-05-07 Thread Andrea Gozzi
Hi guys. I need some help in setting up effective rules to counter a spam wave that has been hitting my server lately. Most of the messages come from hotmail.com accounts and for obvious reasons I can't block the whole domain. All the emails have a common pattern (HTML_LINK + JUNK_TEXT): http://pa

Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-07 Thread Niamh Holding
Hello Rajesh, Saturday, May 7, 2011, 2:01:34 AM, you wrote: RM> could you please let me how i can whitelist specific servers belonging to RM> my clients Create a rbl something like good.mydomain.com with the ips in and then make a rule to query it- header NH_RCVD_IN_GOODRBL

Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, 6 May 2011 21:32:38 -0700 (PDT), John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2011, Rajesh M wrote: > >> could you please let me how i can whitelist specific servers belonging >> to my clients from whom i have to receive email perfectly without ever >> being treated as spam > > The best way is t