Re: SA logo

2011-04-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Hrm, forgot to add... On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 05:37 +0200, me wrote: > > derived from the white-bg logo on the main SA page at > > http://spamassassin.apache.org and would probably be nicer if I had the > > original. (These images suit my current needs just fine.) > http://wiki.apache.org/spamas

Re: SA logo

2011-04-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:51 -0700, Adam Katz wrote: > In the event there is interest, I made a transparent version of the SA > logo as well as a version that is slightly more square. They are > derived from the white-bg logo on the main SA page at > http://spamassassin.apache.org and would probabl

Re: How to prevent SA to make as112 calls?

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
CORRECTIONS: > That looks OK. I assume you've configured the server to be authoritative > for the private.tamay-dogan.net domain, in which case: > > a) requests for unknown host names will be rejected immediately as >'unknown' > > b) requests for unknown IPs in outside subnet 0 will be rejec

Re: How to prevent SA to make as112 calls?

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 06:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Martin Gregorie, > > Am 2011-04-26 23:59:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > Now I'm confused. AFAIK SA doesn't have any connection with AS112 > > lookups as either client or server - unless there's a plugin that hasn't > > bee

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Hepworth
still a little old, 3.3.1 will do alot better job I would suggest -- Martin Hepworth Oxford, UK On 28 April 2011 15:22, Salvatore wrote: > Sorry !! my SA version is: > > spamassassin-3.2.5-2.fc10.i386 > > I am mortified to have given you a wrong information, > Sorry. > > > - > Salvatore. > >

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
Sorry !! my SA version is: spamassassin-3.2.5-2.fc10.i386 I am mortified to have given you a wrong information, Sorry. - Salvatore.

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
"Martin Hepworth" wrote: >Also don't forget the install of SA 3.3 doesn;t include any rules at all and you have to run an sa-update to populate with the latest rules. This version of SA is compatible with amavisd-new 2.2.1 ? I had read that SA 3.3 have problem with amavisd-new 2.2.1, is incorrect

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Hepworth
well it's over 5 years old and even if you're using lots of extra rules I suggest SA will struggle with newer spam around these days. latest SA is quite different so you may want to start from scratch or at least remove any third party rules as alot of these are now included in the normal ruleset

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
"John Hardin" wrote: > You might want to review your bayes training procedures. Do you have > autolearning enabled? That can cause problems under certain > circumstances, > you might want to turn that off. If you are manually training, review > your > corpus for misclassified messages. Misclassifie

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Salvatore wrote: I have posted spam mail: http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj The message hit BAYES_20. You might want to review your bayes training procedures. Do you have autolearning enabled? That can cause problems under certain circumstances, you might want to turn that

Re: How to prevent SA to make as112 calls?

2011-04-28 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Niamh Holding, Am 2011-04-28 07:08:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Don't you want to trust back to 78.47.247.21 and no further? It has nothing to do with my Mailserver, because SA makes the requests to other DNS servers and then I get the UDP-Flood alarm... 04/24/2011 23:52:56 **U

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread RW
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:59:57 +0200 "Salvatore" wrote: > Yet Another Ninja wrote: > > help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com > > I have posted spam mail: > > http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj > Based on the score assigned to RDNS_NONE you're running an older version of SA that

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
Yet Another Ninja wrote: > help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com I have posted spam mail: http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj Thanks. - Salvatore.