On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 21:44 -0600, Chris Pollock wrote:
> Two posts from the same person, one hits on the short circuit rule the
> other doesn't. The line in my dkimwhitelist.cf is:
>
> whitelist_from_dkim ellisf...@embarqmail.com
>
> Headers from one that did hit and one that didn't are posted h
Two posts from the same person, one hits on the short circuit rule the
other doesn't. The line in my dkimwhitelist.cf is:
whitelist_from_dkim ellisf...@embarqmail.com
Headers from one that did hit and one that didn't are posted here:
http://pastebin.com/j0j4pFb1
Anyone see a reason for this?
-
On 03/04/2011 04:11 PM, jdow wrote:
> We, it IS a small number by Nigerian scam standards. So why not
> a small score?
>
> - She ran that way FAST{O,o}
Likewise, I also enjoy weekends:
http://i.imgur.com/cxX6t.jpg (mildly NSFW, though it's on my cube)
We, it IS a small number by Nigerian scam standards. So why not a
small score?
- She ran that way FAST {O,o}
On 2011/03/03 16:40, Dennis German wrote:
Can someone comment on the low score assigned to the email located at
http://www.cccu.us/hundre
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:19 -0500, Dennis German wrote:
> "while the OP uses" OP means ?
Original Poster, he who started the thread. Depending on context, it
also can mean Original Post.
> Please direct me to info on FreeMail plugin.
> Is it expected that I will be able to implement it given I
"while the OP uses" OP means ?
Original Poster.
On 3/3/11 8:06 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 01:53 +0100, Mikael Syska wrote:
I get the following hits:
Content analysis details: (19.1 points, 5.0 required)
Note though, that your score is on SA 3.3.x, while the OP uses SA 3.2.x.
Yes, I can tell this from the scores. :)
On 04/03/11 16:10, Dennis German wrote:
On 3/3/11 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
unsupported and peo
On 3/3/11 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?
That s
Well, it's finally working! Thanks again everyone. It was probably a
combination of things, but after I got the rules working it wasn't scanning
the emails because of an LDAP attribute and settings that needed to be put
in for SA to work with Sun Messaging. Again, Thank you.
--
View this messa
10 matches
Mail list logo
