On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> Matthias, we really need a method to auto-report violations of DNSWL. My
> spam traps receive dozens or more every week.
At what score? Any noteworthy patterns?
> But I don't have time to file
> a web form every time it happens.
The H
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
>> Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam emails
>> to my email account since last tuesday (15th). Out of those 550,
>> *345* have been downscored by RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED. Annoyingly, a
This issue has been resolved (missi
On 2/20/2011 9:11 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Pasi Hirvonen,
Am 2011-02-20 17:22:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Hello,
I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
doesn't.
Looking at my spam folder,
"Warren Togami Jr." wrote:
> On 2/20/2011 6:21 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Pasi Hirvonen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
>>> paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
>>> doesn't.
>>>
On 2/20/2011 6:31 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I know of no reason it would be a temporary hiccup, but it is certainly
unusual. According to spamassassin's mass checks, 0.89% of spam hits
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED: http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/
The masscheck results are a bit misleading, ov
Hello Pasi Hirvonen,
Am 2011-02-20 17:22:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Hello,
>
> I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
> paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
> doesn't.
>
> Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam em
On 20.2.2011 19:50, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
>> Oh. The problem is the folder. Should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, which
>> contains totally different file set. Fixed, and now linting the numerous
>> issues...
>
> I suggest making one a symlink of the other, since you seem to be used
> to the Debi
On 2/20/2011 6:21 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Pasi Hirvonen wrote:
Hello,
I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
doesn't.
Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 5
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 19:38 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 20.2.2011 19:16, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
> > > (this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
> > > package repo.
> > The DecodeShortURL
On 20.2.2011 19:16, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 17:29 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
>> (this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
>> package repo.
>>
>> Errors in logs now:
>>
>> c
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 17:22 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > uri__TD_DOT_INFO m'^http://[^/]*\.info[/:?#]'i
>
> The "uri" line give an error
Yes. Read the full thread.
> > Check the SA rules it hits and add them as dependencies to that meta if
> > you want to increase the score; if it pre
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 17:29 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
> (this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
> package repo.
>
> Errors in logs now:
>
> check[11271]: rules: failed to run HAS_SHORT_URL test,
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:24:58 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/sXbLXFW5
> I don't see any references to roundcube.
received http
On 20/02/11 11:31 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> I'm a DNSWL admin. I would like to see full examples (well, headers).
I sent you and Matthias some headers to look at.
> What IP addresses are being looked up in DNSWL?
>
> It's possible you don't have trusted_networks and internal_networ
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ned Slider wrote:
Here's a quick and dirty rule:
header NSL_TO_ENDS_COMMA To =~ /,$/
describeNSL_TO_ENDS_COMMA To: ends with a comma
score NSL_TO_ENDS_COMMA 0.001
Added to sandbox.
--
John Hard
I'm a DNSWL admin. I would like to see full examples (well, headers).
What IP addresses are being looked up in DNSWL?
It's possible you don't have trusted_networks and internal_networks
configured correctly, resulting in looking up an IP address belonging to
your ISP or another mail server which
Hello Adam Katz,
Am 2011-02-18 14:04:59, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> And thank goodness for that, your rule is WAY too broad to be useful
> as it blocks the ENTIRE .info top-level domain (a very bad idea).
If you get per day arround 2000 of them it IS useful.
> If you really want to do
On 20/02/11 15:49, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:42:23 +, Ned Slider wrote:
Does anyone else see this?
one or more versions of roundcube make this, is it roundcube in your
samples ?
Not sure, here's a sample:
http://pastebin.com/sXbLXFW5
I don't see any references t
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Pasi Hirvonen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
> paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
> doesn't.
>
> Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam emails
> to my email accoun
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:42:23 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Does anyone else see this?
one or more versions of roundcube make this, is it roundcube in your
samples ?
Hi List,
I noticed in a spam mail today the To: line ended in a comma:
To: u...@example.com,
and always being on the lookout for potential new rules decided to
investigate.
Grepping my spam archive I see a small number of matches, but I can't
find any examples in ham.
Here's a quick and d
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:22:23 +0200, Pasi Hirvonen wrote:
> I'm thinking of not bothering with DNSWL tests anymore unless
> someone convinces me this is a temporary hiccup. What are your
> experiences?
report them on dnswl, http://www.dnswl.org/search.pl what dnswl id ?
Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
(this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
package repo.
Errors in logs now:
check[11271]: rules: failed to run HAS_SHORT_URL test, skipping:
check[11271]: (Can't locate object method "short_url_tests" v
Hello,
I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been
paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what
doesn't.
Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam emails
to my email account since last tuesday (15th). Out of those 550,
*345* have been downsc
24 matches
Mail list logo
