On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:23:39 +0100
mouss wrote:
[...]
> you need to train with _your_mail. do not train with somebody else's
> mail. one of the defence args is that attackers can't guess your
> setup. if every one of us uses the same corpus then it'll be easy for
> an attacker to get around.
Th
http://untroubled.org/spam/ --> for spam, updated daily.
--Marco Túlio
*Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Glória*
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:23 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 12/01/2011 23:02, Mahmoud Khonji a écrit :
> > I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to sen
Le 12/01/2011 23:02, Mahmoud Khonji a écrit :
> I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to send me his SPAM/Ham email
> collection.
sigh. if you can't understand what "privacy" means, then you are part of
the problem.
>
> I need it to train and test classifiers.
you need to train with _yo
Le 11/01/2011 22:07, Mark Martinec a écrit :
>> Consider for a moment how hard it would be for an average spammer to
>> spoof rDNS
>
> This has nothing to do with DNS. The trusted/internal/msa networks
> only checks an IP address as it stands in an Received header field,
> it does not check nor de
I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to send me his SPAM/Ham email
collection.
I need it to train and test classifiers.
The issue with available corpus is that they are outdated. They generally
date back in 2005, and lot has changed since then -- We've got SPAMers with
spell checkers at le
