I have domain hosted at google apps, and my domain have recomended by
google txt record "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all". So far when I
receive mail from this domain spamassassin doesn't trigger rule SPF_PASS
nor SPF_SOFTFAIL, is this normal?
I'm running 3.3.1 version
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't
> use an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses? Is
> there a standard?
>
Why do you say "Since you can't use an @ in a DNS lookup"??
Unless you're using obsol
You can try right hand side black lists (RHSBL) for domain part.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Marc Perkel
wrote:
> Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't use
> an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses? Is there a
> standard?
>
> --
>
> Ultimately, this seems to be more of a witch hunt against SORBS than a
> SA issue. Although I'm not opposed to a SORBS witch hunt, I don't think
> it belongs here.
Indeed, and it's Lynford and his money grabbing cronies mostly behind it
- hence it lacks sophistication.
On 12/14/2010 8:06 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2010/12/gfi-sorbs-considered-harmful-part-5/
I've seen the headaches of getting off SORBS, but how did you really end
up there?
While I agree that SORBS is not reliable enough for use at the MTA
level, I've not seen o
On 12/14/10 3:35 PM, Cedric Knight wrote:
On 14/12/10 14:28, Marc Perkel wrote:
Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't
use an @ in a DNS lookup
Actually, you can use '@' in a lookup. You just can't use it in a hostname.
Or you could convert the '@' to a '.' a
On 12/14/10 11:31 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I would strongly encourage your ISP to clean up their act by adding an
excursion detection system, that watches for bursty outbound traffic
patterns, like a sudden spike in outbound SMTP or HTTP connections to a
wide spread of addresses.
Is Aruba.
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2010/12/gfi-sorbs-considered-harmful-part-5/
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:52:28 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Cedric Knight wrote:
>
> > So a hash is best,
>
> Agreed.
>
> > and I'd suggest SHA1 over MD5.
>
> Just out of curiosity, why? An MD5 hash is shorter than an SHA hash
> (an important consideration when you're m
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Cedric Knight wrote:
So a hash is best,
Agreed.
and I'd suggest SHA1 over MD5.
Just out of curiosity, why? An MD5 hash is shorter than an SHA hash (an
important consideration when you're making lots of DNS queries of the
hash), MD5 is computationally lighter than SHA
On 14/12/10 14:28, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't
> use an @ in a DNS lookup
Actually, you can use '@' in a lookup. You just can't use it in a hostname.
Or you could convert the '@' to a '.' as is the format still used in SOA
records
On 12/14/2010 2:38 PM, Big Wave Dave wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Marc Perkel
wrote:
Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't use
an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses? Is there a
standard?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Marc Perkel
wrote:
> Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't use
> an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses? Is there a
> standard?
>
> --
> Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
While not an actual DNSBL, and only lo
Fixicated the copy-n-paste blob to reply...
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 23:08 +0100, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
> 2010/12/14 Karsten Bräckelmann :
> > > How can i retrieve such address?
> > >
> > > $mailTo = $pms->get('EnvelopeTo:addr');
> > > dbg("EvelopeTo-Addr read from mail $mailTo");
> >
> > Does
# I guess the actual header, if any, depends on your MTA and glue. The
# whitelist_to option in the Conf documentation has a list with likely
# candidates.
I use Postfix. What Conf do you talk about?
I have to compare it with a list in a database and with a custom
header but this is not important.
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 22:51 +0100, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
> I wrote a plugin that tries to do some operation on the receiver mail
> address before the message is delivered.
Operation? You're not trying to change it, are you?
> How can i retrieve such address?
>
> $mailTo = $pms->get('Envelo
I wrote a plugin that tries to do some operation on the receiver mail
address before the message is delivered.
How can i retrieve such address?
$mailTo = $pms->get('EnvelopeTo:addr');
dbg("EvelopeTo-Addr read from mail $mailTo");
and i have this output on the log:
Tue Dec 14 22:45:54 2010 [2807]
Le 13/12/2010 23:45, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, mouss wrote:
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
As others have said, it depends who sent it and why. Invitations sent
specifically by people who know you aren't spam, but I've heard it said
several ti
> I would strongly encourage your ISP to clean up their act by adding an
> excursion detection system, that watches for bursty outbound traffic
> patterns, like a sudden spike in outbound SMTP or HTTP connections to a
> wide spread of addresses.
Is Aruba.it so poorly reputed?
g
> -Philip
On tir 14 dec 2010 18:55:12 CET, Oguz Yilmaz wrote
Thanks, a basic tcpdump revealed the method of query and response.
i like comal more then basic, but glad to be of help
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
It's been released for F13 and F14. And of course, it's upstream on CPAN.
It's the promotion of the development version 1.18_81 to production.
Thanks, a basic tcpdump revealed the method of query and response.
--
Oguz YILMAZ
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On tir 14 dec 2010 07:50:17 CET, Oguz Yilmaz wrote
>>>
>>> and you can't resolve zen.spamhaus.org, either. :)
>>
>> Does it mean they are closed?
>
> rndc
On 12/13/10 2:14 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Le 12/12/2010 19:23, Giampaolo Tomassoni a écrit :
How does it work?
I just got blocked by the AT&T's blacklist (in contacting
ab...@att.com,
besides...), but I'm pretty sure my MX is not an open relay or other
kind of
nifty thing.
Maybe AT&T
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 16:58 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is sorbs going to be continued as a scoring option in SA?
>
> Having hit yet more problems with them I've zeroed their scoring.
...
I hope so. I find SORBS wonderful in dealing with those troublesome
mailers that have managed
Hi All,
Is sorbs going to be continued as a scoring option in SA?
Having hit yet more problems with them I've zeroed their scoring.
I found this a couple of days ago, maybe it can add weight.
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2010/12/gfi-sorbs-considered-harmful/
Best to all
Nigel
On tir 14 dec 2010 15:28:54 CET, Marc Perkel wrote
Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you
can't use an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email
addresses? Is there a standard?
no std, but there was a test with emailbl, google it
--
xpoint http://www.u
On tir 14 dec 2010 07:50:17 CET, Oguz Yilmaz wrote
and you can't resolve zen.spamhaus.org, either. :)
Does it mean they are closed?
rndc querylog
spamassassin -t spammsg
rndc querylog
see log
above works when running bin9
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 12/14/10 8:28 AM, "Marc Perkel" wrote:
> Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses?
No. There was an experimental list for a while.
> Since you can't
> use an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses?
# This plugin creates rbl style DNS lookups for ema
On 2010-12-14 15:28, Marc Perkel wrote:
Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses?
nope
Is there a standard?
nope
Are there any DNSBLs out there based on email addresses? Since you can't
use an @ in a DNS lookup - how would you do DNSBL on email addresses? Is
there a standard?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:50:17 +0200
Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Len Conrad
> wrote:
> >
> >>Are you sure? At the moment I can not resolv the name
> >>truncate.gbudb.net.
> >
> > that's correct, and OK.
> >
> > and you can't resolve zen.spamhaus.org, either. :)
>
> Does
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> I don't remotely intend to go vigilante: I don't know how you got that
> from what I said, which I thought boiled down to:
>
> a) If an acquaintance asks you become a member that is not a problem.
In fact, acquaintance or otherwise, that is the whole idea :-)
> b) If a
32 matches
Mail list logo
