Re: Misguided energy (was Re: Do we need a new SMTP protocol? (OT))

2010-12-04 Thread RW
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:08:36 + RW wrote: > On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:44:37 +0100 > Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > > > C/R is only means to make it move your own effort over to others. > > > > The really "interesting" case is if both sides choose to require C/R > > to get the first mail delivere

Re: Misguided energy (was Re: Do we need a new SMTP protocol? (OT))

2010-12-04 Thread RW
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:44:37 +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > C/R is only means to make it move your own effort over to others. > > The really "interesting" case is if both sides choose to require C/R > to get the first mail delivered. > Which should be a clear sign to everyone that C/R is basi

Re: Misguided energy (was Re: Do we need a new SMTP protocol? (OT))

2010-12-04 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mit, 2010-12-01 at 16:17 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:02:03 -0500 > Michael Grant wrote: > > > The main problem with this approach is how does > > someone send you mail if they're not on your contact list? I don't > > have any magic answers how to solve that beyond wh