I tried to install and adapt your script but it seems that it does not
send the correct message to spamd.
Where can i find logs left from my plugin that i can see if i run
spamassassin message -D ?
what's the difference between spamassassin command and spamd?
2010/12/2 Neil Lazarow :
> Massimi
On tor 02 dec 2010 08:34:58 CET, Massimiliano Giovine wrote
i'm writing here because i'd like to have a certain behavior from spamd.
spamd only tags mails, not deliver or discard
I wrote a plugin that assign 10 pt to a mail message:
when i manually run spamassassin it says "hey that's spam".
On 12/1/10 10:37 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:38 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 12/1/10 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a for
Le 02/12/2010 11:47, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, John Wilcock wrote:
I wish I could say the same - at work we have at least a dozen clients
who use challenge/response, and when it's for business you can't just
ignore the challenges, let alone blacklist your clien
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, John Wilcock wrote:
> I wish I could say the same - at work we have at least a dozen clients
> who use challenge/response, and when it's for business you can't just
> ignore the challenges, let alone blacklist your clients.
>
It seems to me that if a business o
I saw that spamassassin returns also a flag "Spam-Flag:TRUE" if score
is more than theresold. How can i handle this flag?
2010/12/2 John Wilcock :
> Le 02/12/2010 09:57, Massimiliano Giovine a écrit :
>>
>> No chance to reproduce this beavior with postfix?
>
> Not with postfix on its own, no. Sp
Le 02/12/2010 09:57, Massimiliano Giovine a écrit :
No chance to reproduce this beavior with postfix?
Not with postfix on its own, no. SpamAssassin returns a score, you
decide what action to take.
There are various "glue" systems to do this for you. My personal
recommendation would be MailS
No chance to reproduce this beavior with postfix?
2010/12/2 Florian Thiessenhusen :
> Hey Massimiliano,
> you should use Amavisd-New (with Build-In Spamassassin and possibility to
> discard Spam) or Procmail as MTA. With Procmail you can built your own rules.
> The main Problem with procmail is
Hey Massimiliano,
you should use Amavisd-New (with Build-In Spamassassin and possibility to
discard Spam) or Procmail as MTA. With Procmail you can built your own rules.
The main Problem with procmail is the bad performance. I recommend amavisd-new.
Florian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Vo
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
> Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
> ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a forged
> sender address.
I see some C/R when machines are stuck talking to each other :(
Someone signs up for a newsletter, or o
10 matches
Mail list logo
