On 11/8/10 5:58 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Philip,
Thanks for your off-list reply. Unfortunately I cannot
reply, as your mailer is refusing connections:
$ host -t mx redfish-solutions.com
redfish-solutions.com mail is handled by 10 mail.redfish-solutions.com.
$ telnet -s mail4.ijs.si mail.redfi
Philip,
Thanks for your off-list reply. Unfortunately I cannot
reply, as your mailer is refusing connections:
$ host -t mx redfish-solutions.com
redfish-solutions.com mail is handled by 10 mail.redfish-solutions.com.
$ telnet -s mail4.ijs.si mail.redfish-solutions.com 25
Trying 66.232.79.143...
On 08/11/2010 12:06 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
Fair enough - fortunately I've not seen any of those here so assumed a
genuine facebook mail had maybe slipped through into the corpus by
mistake.
Either way, it was fixed by the time I'd spotted it.
I've seen it as well, and disabled the Sought rule
Le 20/08/2010 17:12, Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
Hi,
we use spamassassin with the sought ruleset since several years at our
company. After the upgrade to from 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 we notice tons of
false-positives hitting on the rules JM_SOUGHT_1 and JM_SOUGHT_2.
Unfortunaley I can not give examples as
Philip,
> Try the following patch. If it works for you, I'll rerelease as 1.19:
> my ($self, $ip, $bits, $data) = @_;
> - $data ||= $bits ? "$ip/$bits" : $ip;
> + $data ||= defined $bits ? "$ip/$bits" : $ip;
> my $packed = inet_pton(AF_INET6, $ip) || croak("invalid key");
Hmm. What I
On 11/2/10 8:14 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Btw, this could be more gracefully handled:
$ perl -e 'use Socket6; use Net::Patricia'
Prototype mismatch: sub main::AF_INET6: none vs ()
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/Exporter.pm line 64.
Mark
That's someone else's bug:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public
On 08/11/10 15:24, João Gouveia wrote:
- "Ned Slider" wrote:
__SEEK_FMJXND /\. If you do not wish to receive this type of email
from
Facebook in the future, please click here to unsubscribe\. Facebook,
Inc\. P\.O\. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303 /
I'd guess this is caused by the spam
- "Ned Slider" wrote:
> On 21/08/10 21:51, Ned Slider wrote:
> >
> > I'm still seeing FP hits against these rules despite a few sought
> rule
> > updates.
> >
> > It seems there's a few rules hitting on Facebook:
> >
> > # grep Facebook
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/sought_rules_yerp_or
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 28/10/10 15:03, John Hardin escribió:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
IPv4 addresses are numbers (uint4 to be precise), dotted quad notation
is just the most-
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>>> Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
> El 28/10/10 15:03, John Hardin escribió:
>> IPv4 addresses are numbers (uint4 to be precise), dotted quad notation
>> is just the most-human-readable way to represent them.
On 21/08/10 21:51, Ned Slider wrote:
I'm still seeing FP hits against these rules despite a few sought rule
updates.
It seems there's a few rules hitting on Facebook:
# grep Facebook
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/sought_rules_yerp_org/20_sought.cf
body __SEEK_YDK7NN / to unsubscribe\. Faceboo
El 28/10/10 15:03, John Hardin escribió:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
IPv4 addresses are numbers (uint4 to be precise), dotted quad notation
is just the most-human-readable way to represent them. It is vali
12 matches
Mail list logo
