Oliver Block wrote:
> But of course it is annoying to wait for sa-learn to finish each time.
What I do is save the spam message to a spam-incoming maildir folder.
Then I have a separate cron job that runs frequently looking for
messages appearing in that folder. When it finds messages it handles
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:17 +0100, Oliver Block wrote:
> I am experiencing the same problem. I was calling sa-learn as follows:
Since you didn't include the actual output, I assume by "experiencing
the same" you also mean the same sa-learn result? Like this.
Learned from 0 message(s) (4 message
On 11/6/10 3:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
don't forget the tflag 'noautolearn' since the
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:17:43 +0100
Oliver Block wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run into a problem calling sa-learn from mutt. This problem was
> reported at least two times in the past, but no solution to it
> was posted:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200406.mbox/%3c2004
On 11/6/2010 12:50 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be using Vouch-by
On 11/06, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
> spamhaus whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
Thanks for mentioning it. This is based on the DNSWL rules and linted and
loaded, but only seconds ago, so not tested, please proofre
- "Joseph Brennan" wrote:
> --On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 "Dan Mahoney, System
> Admin"
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
> spamhaus
> > whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
> >
> > -Dan
>
>
> Has a paying
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
2) While John's methods for learning and reporting spam work, I've found that
the best way to do it is per-message within spamassassin, via spamd/spamc.
The "pipe" command returns MUCH faster in this config.
Interactively moving the message
--On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
Has a paying customer got an answer from Spamhaus about an rsync feed?
I've as
Hello,
I run into a problem calling sa-learn from mutt. This problem was
reported at least two times in the past, but no solution to it
was posted:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200406.mbox/%3c20040611085128.gc14...@kassi.oddi.is%3e
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mo
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be using Vouch-by-r
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail.
Hello, fellow fossil!
Aah, yonder fossils. I've found, by the way, that if you're not using
Alpine, you sure shou
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry wrote:
> You could also test the envelope sender:
> header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
> '_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be using Vouch-by-reference unless
either DKIM or SPF returns
On 11/6/2010 12:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL eval:check_rbl('SPAMHA
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL eval:check_rbl('SPAMHAUS_SWL', 'swl.spamhaus.org.')
describe SP
15 matches
Mail list logo
