Hi,
I have SpamAssassin(3.3.1) deployed on production servers.
The automatic update is disabled there.
I want to know what is the best approach for ruleset updates:
1. sa-update
2. Manual update
I favor manual update as I want to keep a local list of rule set updates going
to my production an
On Tuesday October 26 2010 19:30:55 Daniel McDonald wrote:
> On 10/26/10 12:18 PM, "Carlos Mennens" wrote:
> > Today for the 1st time on my mail server I attempted to manually run
> > the 'sa-update' command in the shell and got the following:
> >
> >
> > [r...@mail ~]# sa-update
> > defined(%ha
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:59 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> The safest approach for tflags multiple rules is to trigger other rules
> based on the number of hits. meta rules explicitly support this.
>
> meta FOO_4 __TFLAGS_MULTIPLE_SUB >= 4
>
Yes, I agree. Equally importantly, is to avoid
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 20:10 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > The OP wasn't clear whether he wanted ten points _per URI hit_. If that's
> > the case, the regex alternatives and meta solutions aren't appropriate and
> > there's no way to avo
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
The OP wasn't clear whether he wanted ten points _per URI hit_. If that's
the case, the regex alternatives and meta solutions aren't appropriate and
there's no way to avoid one score line per URI
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Karsten Brckelmann wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:53 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> >> For your question, why dont you regexp it?
> >>
> >> uri url_1 /www.domain(1|2|3|4).com/
> >
> > The other technique you ca
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Richard Smits wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to have a list of url's, and define a
score for all of them in one line ?
Now i do like this :
uri url_1 /www.domain1.com/
uri url_2 /www.domain2.com/
uri url_3 /www.domain3.com/
uri url_4 /www.domain4.com/
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:53 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
For your question, why dont you regexp it?
uri url_1 /www.domain(1|2|3|4).com/
The other technique you can use are meta rules
uri __MY_BL_001 /example.(com|net)/
uri __MY_BL_002 /e
On 10/26/10 12:18 PM, "Carlos Mennens" wrote:
> Today for the 1st time on my mail server I attempted to manually run
> the 'sa-update' command in the shell and got the following:
>
>
> [r...@mail ~]# sa-update
> defined(%hash) is deprecated at
> /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin
Today for the 1st time on my mail server I attempted to manually run
the 'sa-update' command in the shell and got the following:
[r...@mail ~]# sa-update
defined(%hash) is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 757.
(Maybe you should just omit the defined
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:53 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> For your question, why dont you regexp it?
>
> uri url_1 /www.domain(1|2|3|4).com/
>
> The exact regexp is naturally depending on the domains but you dont need a
> seperate check for all.
One way to consolidate them, yes -- dependin
On 26/10/10 15:38, Micah Anderson wrote:
The databsae size is 2.74gig.
top - 07:26:39 up 10 days, 20:37, 1 user, load average: 9.24, 6.80, 6.15
Tasks: 24 total, 2 running, 22 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 83.3%us, 16.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.5%si, 0.0%st
M
Dominic Benson writes:
> On 19 Oct 2010, at 17:05, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm running a busy mail server. We've got a bayes database on its own
>> server, with InnoDB tables.
>
> What is your total DB size / server RAM? Could you include a snapshot of the
> output of top f
I was investigating this morning why a number of spam messages were
coming through and found that they weren't scoring on bayes, because it
was unavailable. The database connection was working fine, but I noticed
that the nightly sa-learn --sync --force-expire had been running since
3am, which was
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:40 +, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have SpamAssassin integrated on my postfix mail server via 'Amavisd-new'.
>
I would have simply written a rule:
header BAD_PETER From =~ /pet...@warwick.net/
and given it a high score as a temporary measure while I contacted
Hi,
On 26/10/10 12:40, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have SpamAssassin integrated on my postfix mail server via 'Amavisd-new'.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender with same message-ID on my production mail servers, following
are my po
Hi,
I have SpamAssassin integrated on my postfix mail server via 'Amavisd-new'.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender with same message-ID on my production mail servers, following
are my postfix logs:
"Oct 25 01:11:02 g2t0433g postfix/
Hi!
Now i do like this :
uri url_1 /www.domain1.com/
uri url_2 /www.domain2.com/
uri url_3 /www.domain3.com/
uri url_4 /www.domain4.com/
score url_1 10
score url_2 10
score url_3 10
score url_4 10
Isnt this a bit expensive? Report to SURBL or something and you get them
added ;) (send a
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 08:07 +0200, Richard Smits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if it's possible to have a list of url's, and define a
> score for all of them in one line ?
>
I developed a similar system for my own purposes that you might want to
look at.
The idea is that you define this
19 matches
Mail list logo
