Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 21:09 -0400, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: > Thanks for all the replies. I did run an sa-update. Mail is getting > scored now. /opt/spam/spam users dont have access to, but that is > where I always had bogofilter put mail. Not all users at this stage > have

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 9/30/2010 9:09 PM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: So I added our domain to the local.cf file: whitelist_fr...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us. Ouch, bad idea, unless this daemon is dedicated to internal mail only, and even then it's still not a good solution. If you're having issues th

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread dhottinger
Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann : With 3.3, absolutely *do* run sa-update. First, then use SA. Also, from your SA host's domain I can tell you're a school. Plus, since this is (was) an *old* installation, I wonder if you had used SA before, though not filtered on it. Point being, if you did, you

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:33 -0400, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: > Im testing spamassassin as a replacement for bogofilter. So far I > have it installed, and am calling it with: /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H > -r /var/run/spamd.pid, Im using procmail and have added: > ###spamassassin

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Thanks for the info. I was using the older version because this is a project that I started sometime ago and just got back to. I downloaded the latest version and built it out. Now I have the following in my headers: X-Spam-Chec

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread dhottinger
Quoting John Hardin : On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Im testing spamassassin as a replacement for bogofilter. So far I have it installed, and am calling it with: /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid, Im using procmail and have added: ###spamas

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Im testing spamassassin as a replacement for bogofilter. So far I have it installed, and am calling it with: /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid, Im using procmail and have added: ###spamassassin test : 0fw: spamassas

Re: Own Rule

2010-09-30 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, RW wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote: Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in the subject to[o]? Use

Re: new install

2010-09-30 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 9/30/10 1:33 PM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=6.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER autolearn=ham version=3.1.9 Lets start off with a current version of sa first. then you can get current sa-updates. 3.1.9 is terribly old, rules are old, go to sp

new install

2010-09-30 Thread dhottinger
Im testing spamassassin as a replacement for bogofilter. So far I have it installed, and am calling it with: /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid, Im using procmail and have added: ###spamassassin test :0fw: spamassassin.lock * < 256000 | spamassassin :0: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\

Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX

2010-09-30 Thread njjrdell
thanks for all your help it seems as thou it was a corrupt AWL database. I nuked it and everything seems to be fine. I'm going to look more into smtp auth. Seems like such a simple way to lock down mail, and prevent relaying. For some reason I remember looking into smtp auth and deciding it wasn

Re: Own Rule

2010-09-30 Thread RW
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote: > > > Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the > > eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in the > > subject to[o]? > > Use the __TO_EQ_FROM

Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX

2010-09-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.09.10 08:00, njjrdell wrote: > one of our users at a remote location is having her mail trashed by > spamassassin. > > Sep 28 12:48:43 nsmail spamd[199]: prefork: child states: II\n > Sep 28 12:49:28 nsmail spamd[268]: spamd: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 50226\n > Sep 28

Re: Own Rule

2010-09-30 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote: Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the eMail-recipient is the sender an the eMail-Adress appears in the subject to? Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via sa-update. What exactly do you want to check

Re: Pyzor problem

2010-09-30 Thread Mark Martinec
On Thursday 30 September 2010 06:57:15 Gerald Turner wrote: > "Hans-Werner Friedemann" writes: > > Hi @ all > > > > what´s the matter with pyzor if I get the following hint by starting > > spamd? > > Wed Sep 29 11:23:29 2010 [5176] info: zoom: able to use 675/1223 > > 'body_0' compiled rules (

Own Rule

2010-09-30 Thread Hans-Werner Friedemann
Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the eMail-recipient is the sender an the eMail-Adress appears in the subject to? Thanks for answering!